Abstract
62 rats, operationally divided into those who were seizure-prone and nonseizure-prone, gave similar activity measures over the shorter delays of test but seizure Ss in the longer delay groups moved less than nonseizure Ss before and after bell-can treatment. This finding was interpreted as evidence for an interaction between seizure-prone condition with longer periods of fasting. When Ss were tested in a 4-manipulandum test situation, reinforcement schedules (CRF, FR-4, VR-4, and controls) were differentially effective. Preferences for specific devices developed. Response variability did not differentiate seizure and nonseizure Ss but was significantly influenced by schedules of reinforcement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
