Key-pecking rates before and after a 1.5-yr. interruption were compared in 4 pigeons while they performed on a variable interval schedule of food reinforcement. Analyses showed large differences in rates among animals but no systematic change in the individual rates across the lengthy interruption. The stability of the individual rates were thought to reflect the retention of superstitious response chains maintained by the stimuli associated with the schedule of positive reinforcement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FersterC. B.SkinnerB. G.Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1957.
2.
HerrnsteinR. J.Superstition: A corollary of the principles of operant conditioning. In HonigW. K. (Ed.), Operant behavior: Areas of research and application. New York: Appleton-Cenrury-Crofts, 1966. Pp. 33–51.
3.
HoffmanH. S.FleshlerM.Stimulus factors in aversive controls: The generalization of conditioned suppression. J. exp. Anal. Behav., 1961, 4, 371–378.
4.
HoffmanH. S.FleshlerM.JensenP.Stimulus aspects of aversive controls: The retention of conditioned suppression. J. exp. Anal. Behav., 1963, 6, 575–583.
5.
HoffmanH. S.SelekmanW.FleshlerM.Stimulus aspects of aversive controls: Long term effects of suppression procedures. J. exp. Anal. Behav., in press.
6.
SkinnerB. F.“Superstition” in the pigeon. J. exp. Psychol., 1948, 38, 168–172.
7.
SkinnerB. F.Are theories of learning necessary?Psychol. Rev., 1950, 57, 193–216.
