In a further consideration of the IES “experiment,” it is suggested that its scope be broadened to include contemporary cognate research and theory as guidelines for improving the design of IES testing procedures.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CattellR. B.Personality and motivation: Structure and measurement. New York: World Book, 1957.
2.
DombroseL.SlobinM.The IES Test. Missoula, Mont.: Psychological Test Specialists, 1957.
KohlbergL.Moral development and identification. In StevensonH. W. (Eds.), Child psychology; the 62nd yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education. Chicago: Univer. of Chicago, 1963. Pp. 277–331.
6.
KohlbergL.Development of moral character and moral ideology. In HoffmanM. L. L. W. (Eds.), Review of child development research. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1964. Pp. 383–431.
7.
LeedhamL. R.Empirical study of moral awareness and the construction of a scale to measure conscience. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Univer. of British Columbia, 1958.
8.
PawlikK.CattellR. B.Third-order factors in objective personality tests. Brit. J. Psychol., 1964, 55, 1–18.
9.
PittelS.MendelsohnG.Measurement of moral values: A review and critique. Psychol. Bull., 1966, 66, 22–35.
10.
RempelH.SignoriE.Further research on the IES Photo-analysis subtest with special reference to sex differences. Percept. mot. Skills, 1963, 17, 295–298.
11.
RempelH.SignoriE.SampsonD.Differences in attribution of impulse (Id), ego, and superego functions to male and female photographs. Percept. mot. Skills, 1963, 17, 663–665.
