Attentional Response of Humans and Squirrel Monkeys to Visual Patterns Varying in Three Physical Dimensions

Abstract

2 experiments were performed to investigate the importance to “attention” of 3 physical parameters of visual patterns: number of components, the angular variance of components (AV), and the number of turns characterizing the components (NT). In Exp. I 30 human Ss were employed and time spent viewing each of a set of nonsense patterns was used as the measure of attention. Patterns containing 18 components elicited longer viewing times than those containing 3 components (P < .001), and patterns containing components of high AV were viewed longer than those with components of low AV (P = .052). In Exp. II 8 squirrel monkeys served as Ss and a measure of attention based on performance in a discrimination-learning situation was employed. Again, patterns containing the larger number of components had a greater effect on behavior than patterns with fewer components (P < .05); however, no effect on performance of AV or NT was observed. It was concluded that the number of elements present in visual patterns constitutes a variable of substantial importance to the attention of both the human and the squirrel monkey.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Attneave

Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychol. Rev., 1954, 6, 183–193.

Attneave

Arnoult

M. D.

The quantitative study of shape and pattern perception. Psychol. Bull., 1956, 53, 452–471.

Berlyne

D. E.

The influence of the albedo and complexity of stimuli on visual fixation in the human infant. Brit. J. Psychol., 1958, 49, 315–318.

Berlyne

D. E.

Conflict, arousal, and curiosity. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1960.

Berlyne

D. E.

Complexity and incongruity variables as determinants of exploratory choice and evaluative ratings. Canad. J. Psychol., 1963, 17, 274–290.

Brown

L. T.

Some properties of stimulus complexity related to exploratory behavior in rats. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Princeton Univer., 1961.

Brown

L. T.

Quantitative description of visual patterns: Some methodological suggestions. Percept. mot. Skills, 1964, 19, 771–774.

Brown

L. T.

Farha

Some physical determinants of viewing time under three instructional sets. Percept. & Psychophys., 1966, 1, 2–4.

Cantor

G. N.

Cantor

J. H.

Ditrichs

Observing behavior in preschool children as a function of stimulus complexity. Child Develpm., 1963, 34, 683–689.

10.

Cross

H. A.

Brown

L. T.

Discrimination reversal learning in squirrel monkeys as a function of number of acquisition trials and prereversal experience. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1965, 59, 429–431.

11.

Cross

H. A.

Fickling

R. M.

Carpenter

J. B.

Brown

L. T.

Discrimination reversal performance in squirrel monkeys as a function of prereversal experience and overlearning. Psychon. Sci., 1964, 1, 353–354.

12.

Dember

W. N.

Earl

R. W.

Paradise

Response by rats to differential stimulus complexity. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1957, 50, 514–518.

13.

Jones

L. V.

Distinctiveness of color, form, and position cues for pigeons. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1954, 47, 253–257.

14.

Mackintosh

N. J.

Selective attention in animal discrimination learning. Psychol. Bull., 1965, 64, 124–150.

15.

Michels

K. M.

Zusne

Metrics of visual form. Psychol. Bull., 1965, 63, 74–86.

16.

Miller

G. A.

The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol. Rev., 1956, 63, 81–97.

17.

Morgan

C. T.

Physiological psychology. (3rd ed.) New York: McGraw-Hill, 1965.

18.

Warren

J. M.

Perceptual dominance in discrimination learning by monkeys. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1954, 47, 290–292.

19.

Zusne

Moments of area and of the perimeter of visual form as predictors of discrimination performance. J. exp. Psychol., 1965, 69, 213–220.

20.

Zusne

Michels

K. M.

Nonrepresentational shapes and eye movements. Percept. mot. Skills, 1964, 18, 11–20.