The methodological, sampling, and statistical problems encountered in Cieutat's (1965) study indicate that his findings cannot be accepted with confidence.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AnastasiA.Differential psychology. (3rd ed.) New York: Macmillan, 1958.
2.
BrownF.An experimental and critical study of the intelligence of Negro and white kindergarten children. J. genet. Psychol., 1944, 65, 161–175.
3.
CanadyH. G.The effect of “rapport” on the I.Q.: A new approach to the problem of racial psychology. J. Negro Educ., 1936, 5, 209–219.
4.
CieutatV. J.Examiner differences with the Stanford-Binet IQ. Percept. mot. Skills, 1965, 20, 317–318.
5.
La CrosseJ. E.Examiner reliability on the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale (Form L-M) in a design employing white and Negro examiners. Unpublished master's thesis, Univer. of North Carolina, 1964.
6.
LacyL. D.Relative intelligence of white and colored children. Elem. Sch. J., 1926, 26, 542–546.
7.
PasamanickB.KnoblochH.Early language behavior in Negro children and the testing of intelligence. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1955, 50, 401–402.
8.
ShueyA. M.The testing of Negro intelligence. Lynchburg, Va: Bell, 1958.
9.
WinerB. J.Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.
