The SORT was administered twice to 124 college Ss along with the Sarason TAQ and the Taylor MAS. Ss were asked to choose and give ratings of enthusiasm for the choice as well as to indicate form resemblance. Results showed: (1) a great deal of the variance involved in selection of the blot cannot be attributed to the blot resemblance; (2) the mean reliability coefficient of the enthusiasm measure is not high, indicating that Ss may be forcing choices; (3) of the SORT factors only H was related to anxiety as measured by the Sarason TAQ and the Taylor MAS; and (4) response-items on the SORT may be mixed with respect to pathological significance.
KlopferB.AinsworthM. C.KlopferW. C.HoltR. R.Developments in the Rorschach techniques. Vol. I. Yonkers-on-Hudson, N. Y.: World Book, 1954.
3.
LangerP.CarlisleA. L.HayesW. G.The effects of anxiety and conformity on the Structured-Objective Rorschach Test (SORT). J. clin. Psychol., 1963, 19, 317–319.
4.
LangerP.HayesW. G.SharpH. C.Effects of anxiety and induced stress on the Structured-Objective Rorschach Test. Percept. mot. Skills, 1963, 19, 573–580.
5.
LangerP.HickT. L.The Structured-Objective Rorschach Test: A question of choice frequency. Percept. mot. Skills, 1965, 21, 687–697.
6.
LangerP.McKainC. W.Rigidity and the SORT. J. clin. Psychol., 1964, 20, 489–492.
7.
LangerP.WoodC. G.A comparison of two multiple-choice Rorschach tests. Percept. mot. Skills, 1965, 20, 143–150.
8.
LeeL. C.The effects of anxiety level and shock on a paired-associate verbal task. J. exp. Psychol., 1961, 61, 213–217.
9.
RorschachH.Psychodiagnostics. Berne: Huber, 1942.
10.
RossiA. M.An evaluation of the manifest anxiety scale by the use of electromyography. J. exp. Psychol., 1959, 58, 64–69.
11.
SarasonI. G.Interrelationships among individual difference variables, behavior in psychotherapy, and verbal conditioning. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1958, 56, 339–344.
12.
StoneJ. B.S-O Rorschach Test, manual. Los Angeles, Calif.: Calif. Test Bureau, 1958.
13.
TaylorJ. A.A personality scale of manifest anxiety. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1953, 48, 285–290.
