Abstract
An apparent contradiction in the effects of figure measured in terms of light threshold and CFF was explained on the basis of interactions of onset-offset stimulus characteristics, duration of the stimulus, and background illumination.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Dodt
E.
Enroth
C.
Retinal flicker response in cats . Acta physiol. Scand. , 1953 , 29 , 375 –390 .
2.
Ito
M.
[Measurement of field forces in visual perception by flicker method.] Jap. J. Psychol. , 1956 , 27 , 209 –217 .
3.
Mitarai
G.
Yagasaki
Y.
Resting and action potential of a single cone . Ann. Rep. Res. Inst. environ. Med., Nagoya Univer. , 1956 , 1 , 54 –64 .
4.
Mori
T.
Effect of stimulus organization upon CFF . Jap. J. Psychol. , 1956 , 26 , 411 –413 .
5.
Ohkawa
N.
The effect of various figures upon critical fusion frequency of a flickering small patch . Jap. psychol. Res. , 1954 , 1 , 34 –44 .
6.
Svaetichin
G.
Ottoson
D.
Electrophysiological investigations of the frog retina . Acta physiol. Scand. , 1954 , 30 , 538 –564 .
7.
Yokose
Z.
Psychology of visual perception . Tokyo : Kyoritsu Shuppan , 1956 .
8.
Yokose
Z.
Uchiyama
M.
The measurement of the field forces in visual perception . Jap. J. Psychol. , 1952 , 22 , 41 –56 .