Abstract
Previous research has shown that the relative performance of high anxious (HA) and low anxious (LA) Ss (defined by scores on the Taylor MAS) on the initial trials of a judgmental task is different depending on whether the HA and LA Ss judged in a group or individually. In this study 64 male undergraduate Ss were given the task of rating the amount of confusion exhibited in 100 vocabulary test responses taken from schizophrenics' test protocols. Because of previous research HA Ss were expected to perform less well than LA Ss on the first trial when Ss judged individually. This expectation was not borne out. When HA Ss and LA Ss worked in a group, there was no difference in performance as expected. An analysis of variance was done on the z′ values of the mean interjudge reliabilities (essentially, a measure of how well the judges agreed with each other), the variables being level of anxiety (HA or LA), social situation (group or individual condition), and sets of stimuli. All three variables plus various interactions between them had significant effects on performance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
