The performance of 6 monkeys and 5 children was compared on a task involving the discrimination of changes in orientation of plane figures. Children made fewer errors than monkeys when figures were rotated 180°. For both groups the sequence of presentation of problems was an important determinant of performance.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BraineL. G.Age changes in the mode of perceiving geometric forms. Psychon. Sci., 1965, 2, 155–156.
2.
GellermanL. W.Chance orders of alternating stimuli in visual experiments. J. genet. Psychol., 1933, 42, 206–208. (a)
3.
GellermanL. W.Form discrimination in chimpanzees and two-year-old children: I. Form (triangularity) per se. J. genet. Psychol., 1933, 42, 2–27. (b)
4.
GhentL.Recognition by children of realistic figures presented in various orientations. Canad. J. Psychol., 1960, 14, 249–256.
5.
GhentL.Form and its orientation: A child's-eye-view. Amer. J. Psychol., 1961, 74, 177–190.
6.
GhentL.BernsteinL.Influence of the orientation of geometric forms on their recognition by children. Percept. mot. Skills, 1961, 12, 95–101.
7.
GibsonE. J.GibsonJ. J.PickA. D.OsserH.A developmental study of the discrimination of letter-like forms. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1962, 55, 897–906.
8.
HarlowH. F.Studies in discrimination learning by monkeys: VI. J. gen. Psychol., 1945, 33, 225–235.
9.
HicksL. H.HuntonV. D.The relative dominance of form and orientation in discrimination learning by monkeys and children. Psychon. Sci., 1964, 1, 411–412.
10.
HuntonV. D.The recognition of inverted pictures by children. J. genet. Psychol., 1955, 86, 281–288.
11.
HuntonV. D.HicksL. H.A portable modification of the Wisconsin General Test Apparatus. Amer. J. Psychol., 1959, 72, 291–292.
12.
RudelR. G.TeuberH. L.Discrimination of direction of line in children. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1963, 56, 892–897.
13.
SternW.Psychology of early childhood. (3rd ed.) London: Allen & Unwin, 1924.
14.
SutherlandN. S.Visual discrimination of orientation by octopus: Mirror-images. Brit. J. Psychol., 1960, 51, 9–18.