This experiment confirms an earlier finding that similarity in size between test and masking stimuli is directly related to the extent of backward masking. In addition, it is shown that this relation is in part due to the greater difficulty in perceptually segregating test from mask when these are similar in size. The remainder of the effect, however, seems attributable to a retroactive masking effect that varies directly with stimulus similarity.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FehrerE.The effect of stimulus similarity on retroactive masking. J. exp. Psychol., in press.
2.
FehrerE.RaabD.Reaction time to stimuli masked by metacontrast. J. exp. Psychol., 1962, 63, 143–147.
3.
KarlinL.The New York University tachistoscope. Amer. J. Psychol., 1955, 68, 462–466.
4.
NeffW. S.A critical investigation of the visual apprehension of movement. Amer. J. Psychol., 1936, 48, 1–42.
5.
OrlanskyJ.The effect of similarity and difference in form on apparent visual movement. Arch. Psychol., 1940, No. 246.
6.
TochH. H.The perceptual elaboration of stroboscopic presentations. Amer. J. Psychol., 1956, 69, 345–358.
