Sections of figures were presented visually in random and orderly sequences. Later identification was easier for orderly sequences and for faster presentations. Fixation and size of section had no effect.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BrunerJ. S.GoodnowJ. J.AustinG. A.A study of thinking. New York: Wiley, 1956.
2.
DeeseJ.KaufmanR. A.Serial effects in recall of unorganized and sequentially organized verbal material. J. exp. Psychol., 1957, 54, 180–187.
3.
HarcumE. R.FriedmanS. M.Reproduction of binary visual patterns having different element-presentation sequences. J. exp. Psychol., 1963, 66, 300–307.
4.
MillerG. A.HeiseG. A.LichtenW.The intelligibility of speech as a function of the context of the test materials. J. exp. Psychol., 1951, 41, 329–335.
5.
MillerG. A.SelfridgeJ. A.Verbal context and the recall of meaningful material. Amer. J. Psychol., 1950, 63, 176–187.
6.
WhiteB. W.Effect of temporal ordering on visual recognition. Percept. mot. Skills, 1962, 15, 75–81.
