Abstract
This experiment tests the hypothesis that partial information about a word from a pre-recognition tachistoscopic exposure affects subsequent recognition accuracy for that word. Word recognition under modified Methods of Limits and Single Stimuli was compared, with the only procedural difference being that O saw five different words on five successive ascending exposures (Single Stimuli), or the same word on five successive ascending exposures (Limits). It was predicted that the pre-recognition exposures would facilitate recognition of “Predictable” words, i.e., words which could be correctly guessed after only some letters had been perceived, but hinder perception of “Non-predictable” words. Since words of predictable and non-predictable categories were recognized equally often, the procedure for differentiating between these words was not effective. Perceptual accuracy was greater under the Method of Limits for both classifications of words.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.