Three graphoanalysts judged specimens of handwriting for five personality traits: attention to detail, domineeringness, persistence, self-consciousness, and stubbornness. The average inter-judge correlation was .78. Reliability is, therefore, established. Advantages of handwriting analysis that enhance its potential validity are pointed out, especially its vulnerability to faking and artifactual changes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BunkerM. N.Handwriting analysis; the art and science of reading character by graphoanalysis. Chicago, Ill.: Nelson-Hall, 1959.
2.
LintonH.EpsteinL.HartfordH.Personality and perceptual correlates of secondary beginning strokes in handwriting. Percept. mot. Skills, 1961, 12, 271–281.
3.
LintonH.EpsteinL.HartfordH.Personality and perceptual correlates of primary beginning strokes in handwriting. Percept. mot. Skills, 1962, 15, 159–170.
4.
LorrM.LepineL. T.GolderJ. V.A factor analysis of some handwriting characteristics. J. Pers., 1954, 22, 348–353.
5.
MuenierJ. A. [Points of view on graphology.] Bull. G. Etud. Psychol., Univer. of Paris, 1952, 6, 453–454. (Abstract)
6.
MuhlA. M.Handwriting as a diagnostic aid. J. Amer. Med. Worn. Assn, 1950, 5, 312–315. (a)
7.
MuhlA. M.Unreliability of behavior as evidenced in handwriting. Med. Wom. J., 1950, 57, 27–30. (b)
8.
MullerW. H.Objectivity of expressive qualities in handwriting. Psychol. Beit., 1957, 3, 364–389.
9.
OttoW.LasswellA.Relationship of secondary beginning strokes in handwriting to reading ability. Percept. mot. Skills, 1962, 14, 530.
10.
PittrichH.The use of handwriting in psychotherapy. Psychother. med. Psychol., 1957, 7, 150–155.
11.
SecordP. F.Studies of the relationship of handwriting to personality. J. Pers., 1949, 17, 430–448.
12.
SonnemanU.KernanJ. P.Handwriting analysis: A valid selection tool?Personnel, 1962, 39(6), 8–14.
13.
Von der MuhlenR. [Significant signs in the practice of graphology.] Psychol. Berater gesunde prakt. Lebensgestalt, 1952, 4, 365–371. (Abstract)