Repeated verbal responses to short English word stimuli contain more correct letters than do verbal responses given only once. The letter-positions of the repeated verbal responses vary significantly in their content of correct letters.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GoldiamondI., & HawkinsW. F.Vexierversuch: the log relationship between word frequency and recognition obtained in the absence of stimulus words. J. exp. Psychol., 1958, 56, 457–463.
2.
HavensL. L., & FooteW. E.A method for controlling the extent of partial perception in experiments on “subliminal” perception. Percept. mot. Skills, 1961, 12, 263–269.
3.
HavensL. L., & FooteW. E.The effect of competition on visual duration threshold and its independence of stimulus frequency. J. exp. Psychol., 1963, 65, 6–11.
4.
HowesD. H., & SolomonR. L.Visual duration threshold as a function of word probability. J. exp. Psychol., 1951, 41, 401–410.
5.
MishkinM., & ForgaysD. G.Word recognition as a function of retinal locus. J. exp. Psychol., 1952, 43, 43–48.
6.
WiegandC. F.Untersuchungen ueber die Bedeutung der Gestaltqualitaet fuer die Erkennung von Woerten. Z. Psychol., 1908, 48, 168–178.
