By means of a brief historical resume are considered some of the problems encountered when administering electric shock to laboratory animals during behavioral experiments, principally via use of the grid floor. The complexity of the variable electric shock leads us to suggest that there is no simple quantitative and qualitative characterization of electric shock. An apparatus is described for administering electric current to a grid floor; it incorporates an optimum compromise of theoretical, electrical, and mechanical techniques presently available.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BarnettA.The phase angle of normal human skin. J. Physiol., 1938, 93, 349–366.
2.
BeckL. H.WaterhouseI. K.RunyonR. F.Practical and theoretical solutions to difficulties in using Licklider's rat shocker. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1953, 46, 407–410.
3.
BushR. R.EstesW. K. (Eds.) Studies in mathematical learning theory. Stanford Univer. Press, 1959.
4.
CampbellB. A.The reinforcement difference limen (RDL) function for shock reduction. J. exp. Psychol., 1956, 52, 258–262.
5.
CampbellB. A.KraelingD.Response strength as a function of drive level and amount of drive reduction. J. exp. Psychol., 1953, 45, 97–101.
6.
CampbellB. A.TeghtsoonianR.Electrical and behavioral effects of different types of shock stimuli on the rat. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1958, 51, 185–192.
7.
DarrowC. W.Sensory secretory and electrical changes in the skin following bodily excitation. J. exp. Psychol., 1927, 10, 197–227.
8.
DavidsonR.BooninN.A constant current stimulus generator. Amer. J. Psychol., 1956, 69, 466–468.
9.
DavisR. C.A vacuum tube for stabilizing the current during measurements of the galvanic reflex. Amer. J. Psychol., 1929, 41, 474–475.
10.
DavisR. C.PorterJ. M.A measuring device for the galvanic reflex. J. gen. Psychol., 1931, 5, 115–120.
11.
DinsmoorJ. A.CampbellS. L.Level of current and time between sessions as factors in “adaptation” to shock. Psychol. Rep., 1956, 2, 441–444.
12.
DunlapK.Standardizing electric shocks for rats. J. comp. Psychol., 1931, 12, 133–135.
13.
DunlapK.GentryE.ZeiglerT. W.The behavior of white rats under food and electric shock stimulation. J. comp. Psychol., 1931, 7, 371–378.
14.
ForbesR. W.BernsteinA. L.The standardization of sixty cycle electrical shock for practical use in psychological experimentation. J. gen. Psychol., 1935, 12, 436–442.
15.
ForbesR. W.MuenzingerK. F.WendtG. R.Report of round tables on the use of electric shock in experiments. Psychol. Bull., 1935, 32, 185–196.
16.
GreenR. T.Threshold of electric shock of the laboratory rat. J. Animal Behav., 1958, 6, 72–76.
17.
HathawayS. R.A comparative study of the psychogalvanic reflex and association time measurements, a new psychogalvanic apparatus. J. appl. Psychol., 1929, 13, 632–646.
18.
HillH. E.FlanaryH. G.KarnetskyC. H.WiklerA.Relationship of electrically induced pain to amperage and wattage of shock stimulus. J. clin. Investigation, 1952, 31, 464–472.
JacksonT. A.RiessB. F.Electric shock with different size electrodes. J. gen. Psychol., 1934, 45, 262–266.
21.
JasperH. H.A laboratory study of diagnostic indices of bilateral neuromuscular organization in stutterers and normal speakers. Psychol. Monogr., 1932, 43, No. 1 (Whole No. 194).
22.
JenkinsR. N.WarnerL. N.WardenC. J.Standard apparatus for the study of animal motivation. J. comp. Psychol., 1926, 6, 361–382.
23.
KelloggW. N.Shock as a motivating stimulus in conditioning experiments. J. gen. Psychol., 1941, 25, 85.
24.
LickliderJ. C.A gridless, wireless rat shocker. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1951, 44, 334–337.
25.
LightR. U.ChaffeeE. L.Electrical excitation of the nervous system. Science, 1934, 79, 299–300.
26.
LorgeI.Physiological aspects of lethal shock. Psychol. Bull., 1935, 32, 197–202.
27.
MartinE. G.A quantitative study of faradic stimulation: II. The calibration of the inductorium for break-shocks. Amer. J. Physiol., 1908, 22, 116–132.
28.
MaxL. W.Protective devices and precautions against lethal shock. Psychol. Bull., 1935, 32, 203–211.
29.
MillerN. E.MurrayE. J.Displacement and conflict: Learnable drive as a basis for the steeper gradient of avoidance than approach. J. exp. Psychol., 1952, 43, 227–231.
30.
MuenzingerK. F.Motivation in learning: I. Electrical shock for correct response in visual discrimination habit. J. comp. Psychol., 1934, 267–277.
31.
MuenzingerK. F.MizeR. H.The sensitivity of the white rat to electric shock. J. comp. Psychol., 1933, 15, 41–47.
32.
MuenzingerK. F.WalzF. C.An analysis of the electrical stimulus producing a shock. J. comp. Psychol., 1932, 13, 157–171.
33.
MuenzingerK. F.WalzF. C.An examination of electric current stabilizing devices for psychological experiments. J. gen. Psychol., 1934, 10, 477–482.
34.
PlutchikR.HirschH. R.Skin impedance and phase angle as a function of frequency and current. Science, 1963, 41, 927–928.
35.
ShakleeA. B.Measurement of cutaneous electrical thresholds in animal research. Amer. J. Psychol., 1957, 70, 624–627.
36.
SheffieldF. D.TemmerH. W.Relative resistance to extinction of escape training and avoidance training. J. exp. Psychol., 1950, 40, 287–298.
37.
SkinnerB. F.CampbellS. L.An automatic shocking apparatus for conditioning use. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1947, 40, 305–307.
38.
SolomonR. L.BrushE. S.Experimentally derived concepts of anxiety and aversion. In JonesM. R. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1956. Lincoln: Univer. Nebraska Press, 1956. Pp. 212–305.
