Since certain curvature aftereffects require active movements during prismatic adaptation, non-visual components must affect some (but not all) visual shape perception.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CohenM.Visual curvature and feedback factors in the production of prismatically induced curved-line aftereffects. Paper read at Eastern Psychological Assn, New York, April, 1963.
2.
GibsonJ. J.Adaptation with negative aftereffect. Psychol. Rev., 1937, 44, 242.
3.
HarrisC. S.Adaptation to displaced vision: Visual, motor, or proprioceptive change?Science, 1963, 141, 812–813.
4.
HeldR.Adaptation to rearrangement and visual-spatial aftereffects. Psychol. Beitr., 1962, 6, 439–450.
5.
HeldR.Movement-produced stimulation is important in prism-induced aftereffects: A reply to Hochberg. Percept. mot. Skills, 1963, 16, 764.
6.
HeldR.RekoshJ.Motor-sensory feedback and the geometry of visual space. Science, 1963, 141, 722–723.
7.
HochbergJ.On the importance of movement-produced stimulation in prism-induced aftereffects. Percept. mot. Skills, 1963, 16, 544.
8.
HochbergJ.HayJ.Figural aftereffect, after-image, and physiological nystagmus. Amer. J. Psychol., 1956, 69, 480–482.
9.
KoehlerW.WallachH.Figural aftereffects: An investigation of visual processes. Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc., 1944, 88, 269–357.
10.
KrauskopfJ.Figural after-effects with a stabilized retinal image. Amer. J. Psychol., 1960, 73, 294–297.
11.
MikaelianH.HeldR.Two types of adaptation to an optically-rotated visual field. Amer. J. Psychol., in press.
12.
WallsG. L.The problem of visual direction. Amer. J. Optom., 1951, 28, 55–83, 115–146.
