Based upon data concerning contour orientation and interaction and the stimulus variables affecting the Mueller-Lyer illusion, an explanation for the illusion was advanced. Predictions made for the effects of prolonged fixation of each of the component figures were experimentally confirmed. The theoretical rationale proposed was discussed in terms of possible difficulties which require further empirical investigation.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BartleyS. H.Vision. New York: Van Nostrand, 1941.
2.
v. BiervlietJ. J.Nouvelles mesures des illusions visuelles chez les adults et les enfants. Rev. Phil., 1896, 41, 169–181.
3.
BinetA.La mesure des illusions visuelles chez les enfants. Rev. Phil., 1895, 40, 11–25.
4.
DayR. H.The effects of repeated trials and prolonged fixation on error in the Mueller-Lyer figure. Psychol. Monogr., 1962, 76, No. 14 (Whole No. 533).
5.
DayR. H.LoganJ.A further investigation of apparent size and retinal size as determinants of the figural after-effect. Quart. J. exp. Psychol., 1961, 13, 193–203.
6.
EysenckH. J.SlaterP.Effects of practice and rest on fluctuations in the Mueller-Lyer illusion. Brit. J. Psychol., 1958, 49, 246–255.
7.
JuddC. H.Practice and its effects on the perceptions of illusions. Psychol. Rev., 1902, 9, 27–39.
8.
KoehlerW.FishbackJ.The destruction of the Mueller-Lyer illusion in repeated trials: I. An examination of two theories. J. exp. Psychol., 1950, 40, 267–281. (a).
9.
KoehlerW.FishbackJ.The destruction of the Mueller-Lyer illusion in repeated trials: II. Satiation patterns and memory traces. J. exp. Psychol., 1950, 40, 398–409. (b).
10.
KoehlerW.WallachH.Figural aftereffects: An investigation of visual processes. Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc., 1944, 88, 269–357.
11.
LewisE. C.The effect of practice on the perception of the Mueller-Lyer illusion. Brit. J. Psychol., 1908, 2, 294–306.
12.
McEwenP.Figural aftereffects, retinal size and apparent size. Brit. J. Psychol., 1959, 50, 41–47.
13.
MoedG.Satiation-theory and the Mueller-Lyer illusion. Amer. J. Psychol., 1959, 72, 609–611.
14.
MountjoyP. T.Effects of exposure time and intertrial interval upon decrement to the Mueller-Lyer illusion. J. exp. Psychol., 1958, 56, 97–102.
15.
OgasawaraJ.Displacement effect of concentric circles. Jap. J. Psychol., 1952, 22, 16–26.
16.
PiagetJ.LambercierM.BoeschE.v. AlbertiniB.Recherches sur le development des perceptions: I. Introduction a l'etude des perceptions chez l'enfant et analyse d'une illusion relative a la perception visuelle de cercles concentriques (Delboeuf). Arch. de Psychol., 1942, 29, 1–107.
17.
PollackR. H.Effects of temporal order of stimulus presentation on the direction of figural aftereffects. Percept. mot. Skills, 1963, 17, 875–880.
18.
SutherlandN. S.Figural aftereffects, retinal size and apparent size. Quart. J. exp. Psychol., 1954, 6, 35–44.
