Abstract
In a previous experiment, a fixated three-dimensional object was shown to recede from the position it held prior to fixation. Since this phenomenon may be accounted for in terms of a visual compensation for the strain of convergence during prolonged fixation, it was expected that fixation of a near figure would result in a greater aftereffect than fixation of a far figure. The results of this study indicated that, while there was a greater frequency of expected aftereffects with the near figures, there was also a greater frequency of reversed aftereffects with the far figures. The latter finding raised problems of an interpretation of the theory under consideration, the implications of which were discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
