In two experiments, eight-letter words and nonsense words, having the letters and the sequence of letters in normal or reversed orientations, were briefly exposed across fixation. Recognition of letters to the right and left of fixation was, on the whole, affected by directional attributes of the stimuli. These results are interpreted as providing evidence for functional factors in the scanning of visual patterns, as opposed to “structural” dominances in the nervous system.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AndersonI. H.The effect of letter-position on range of apprehension scores, with special reference to reading disability. Univer. Mich. Sch. Educ. Bull., 1946, 18, 37–40.
2.
AndersonI. H.CroslandH. R.A method of measuring the effect of primacy of report in the range of attention experiment. Amer. J. Psychol., 1933, 45, 701–713.
3.
AulhornO.Die Lesegeschwindigkeit als Funktion von Buchstaeben und Zeilenlaege. Pflueg. Arch. ges. Physiol., 1948, 250, 12–25.
BrydenM. P.Tachistoscopic recognition of non-alphabetical material. Canad. J. Psychol., 1960, 14, 78–86.
6.
ChenL. K.CarrH. A.The ability of Chinese students to read in vertical and horizontal directions. J. exp. Psychol., 1926, 9, 110–117.
7.
CrovitzH. F.DavesW.Tendencies to eye movement and perceptual accuracy. J. exp. Psychol., 1962, 63, 495–498.
8.
DyerD. W.HarcumE. R.Visual perception of binary patterns by preschool children and by school children. J. educ. Psychol., 1961, 52, 161–165.
9.
FernaldG.Remedial techniques in basic school subjects. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1943.
10.
ForgaysD. G.The development of differential word recognition. J. exp. Psychol., 1953, 45, 165–168.
11.
HarcumE. R.Three inferred factors in the visual recognition of binary targets. In WulfeckJ. W.TaylorJ. H. (Eds.), Form discrimination as related to military problems. Washington, D. C.: Nat. Acad. Sci-Nat. Res. Coun., 1957. Pp. 32–37. (Publ. 561).
12.
HarcumE. R.DyerD. W.Monocular and binocular reproduction of binary stimuli appearing right and left of fixation. Amer. J. Psychol., 1962, 75, 56–65.
13.
HarcumE. R.FinkelM. E.Explanation of Mishkin and Forgays' result as a directional-reading conflict. Canad. J. Psychol., 1963, 17, 224–234.
14.
HarcumE. R.FriedmanS. M.‘Reversal’ reading by Israeli observers of visual patterns without intrinsic directionality. Canad. J. Psychol., in press.
15.
HarcumE. R.HartmanR.SmithN. F.Pre- vs. post-knowledge of required reproduction-sequence for tachistoscopic patterns. Canad. J. Psychol., 1963, 17, 264–273.
16.
HarcumE. R.JonesM. L.Letter-recognition within words flashed left and right of fixation. Science, 1962, 138, 444–445.
17.
HarcumE. R.RabeA.Visual recognition along various meridians of the visual field: III. Patterns of blackened circles in an eight-circle template, Univer. Mich. Engng Res. Inst. Proj. Michigan Rep. 2144–294-T, 1958.
18.
HebbD. O.The organization of behavior. New York: Wiley, 1949.
19.
HeronW.Perception as a function of retinal locus and attention. Amer. J. Psychol., 1957, 70, 38–48.
20.
MishkinM.ForgaysD. G.Word recognition as a function of retinal locus. J. exp. Psychol., 1952, 43, 43–48.
21.
OrbachJ.Retinal locus as a factor in the recognition of visually perceived words. Amer. J. Psychol., 1952, 65, 555–562.
22.
PenfieldW.RobertsL.Speech and brain-mechanisms. Princeton: Princeton Univer. Press, 1959.
23.
SiegelS.Nonparametric statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.
24.
SperlingG.The information available in brief visual presentations. Psychol. Monogr., 1960, 74, No. 11 (Whole No. 498).
25.
TerraceH. S.The effects of retinal locus and attention on the perception of words. J. exp. Psychol., 1959, 58, 382–385.
26.
TinkerM. A.Perceptual and oculomotor efficiency in reading material in vertical and horizontal arrangements. Amer. J. Psychol., 1955, 68, 444–449.
