Ss were asked to judge the duration of a 16-sec. standard by verbal estimation and by two methods of reproduction. As before, judgments obtained by these three methods did not correlate significantly. Changes in judgment from one session to another did correlate significantly, indicating that there may be a common intra-individual basis for different methods of time judgment.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ClausenJ.An evaluation of experimental methods of time judgment. J. exp. Psychol., 1950, 40, 756–761.
2.
DanzigerK.Du PreezP. D.Reliability of time estimation by the method of reproduction. Percept. mot. Skills, 1963, 16, 879–884.
3.
KruupK.Influence of method on time judgments. Austral. J. Psychol., 1961, 13, 44–53.
4.
SiegmanA. W.Intercorrelation of some measures of time estimation. Percept. mot. Skills, 1962, 14, 381–382.
5.
WeberC. O.Estimation of time. Psychol. Bull., 1933, 30, 233–252.
