CohenM.Visual curvature and feedback factors in the production of prismatically induced curved-line after-effects. Paper read at Eastern Psychological Assn, New York, April, 1963.
2.
GibsonJ. J.RadnerM.Adaptation, after-effect, and contrast in the perception of tilted lines: I. Quantitative studies. J. exp. Psychol., 1937, 20, 453–467.
3.
HeldR.Exposure-history as a factor in maintaining stability of perception and coordination. J. nerv. ment. Dis., 1961, 132, 26–32.
4.
HeldR.Adaptation to rearrangement and visual-spatial aftereffects. Psychol. Beitraege, 1962, 6, 439–450.
5.
HochbergJ.On the importance of movement-produced stimulation in prism-induced after-effects. Percept. mot. Skills, 1963, 16, 544.
6.
MikaelianH.HeldR.Two types of adaptation to an optically rotated visual field. Amer. Psychologist, 1961, 16, 421. (Abstract)
7.
MikaelianH.HeldR.Two types of adaptation to an optically-rotated visual field. Amer. J. Psychol., in press.
8.
RekoshJ.HeldR.Visual-spatial distortion produced by the sensory feedback accompanying locomotion. Paper read at Eastern Psychological Assn, New York, April, 1963.
