Isolation of a circumscribed area of the skin on the forearm for a week resulted in an increase in tactual acuity. Application of constant pressure to the same area resulted in decreased tactual acuity. These changes were still evident two days after the experiment. It is believed that central rather than peripheral factors are responsible for these changes. Temperature and pain sensitivity were not affected.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
FreedmanS. J.GreenblattM.Studies in human isolation. Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio: WADC Aero-Medical Lab., 1959 (Tech. Rep., 59–266).
HaberW. B.Effects of loss of limb on sensory functions. J. Psychol., 1955, 40, 115–123.
4.
HeronW.Cognitive and physiological effects of perceptual isolation. In SolomonP.KubzanskyP. E.LeidermanP. H.MendelsonJ. H.TrumbullR.WexlerD. (Eds.), Sensory deprivation. Cambridge: Harvard Univer. Press, 1961. Pp. 6–33.
5.
KatzD.Psychologische Versuche mit Amputierten. Z. Psychol. Physiol., 1920, 85, 83–117.
6.
KubzanskyP. E.LeidermanP. H.Sensory deprivation: An overview. In SolomonP.KubzanskyP. E.LeidermanP. H.MendelsonJ. H.TrumbullR.WexlerD. (Eds.), Sensory deprivation. Cambridge: Harvard Univer. Press, 1961. Pp. 221–238.
7.
MelzakR.WallP. D.On the nature of cutaneous sensory mechanisms. Brain. 1962, 85, 331–356.
8.
RosenbaumG.DobieS. I.CohenB. D.Visual recognitive thresholds following sensory deprivation. Amer. J. Psychol., 1959, 72, 429–433.
9.
SharplessS.JasperH.Habituation of the arousal reaction. Brain, 1956, 79, 655–680.
10.
ShewchukL.ZubekJ. P.A technique of intermittent stimulation for measurement of tactual sensitivity: Apparatus and preliminary results. Canad. J. Psychol., 1960, 14, 29–37. (a).
11.
ShewchukL.ZubekJ. P.Discriminatory ability of various skin areas as measured by a technique of intermittent stimulation. Canad. J. Psychol., 1960, 14, 244–248. (b).
12.
SiegelS.Non-parametric statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.
13.
TeuberH. L.KriegerH. P.BenderM. B.Reorganization of sensory function in amputation stumps: Two point discrimination. Fed. Proc., 1949, 8, 156.
14.
VernonJ.McGillT. E.Sensory deprivation and pain thresholds. Science, 1961, 133, 330–331.
15.
WilsonJ. J.WilsonB. C.SwinyardC. A.Two-point discrimination in congenital amputees. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1962, 55, 482–485.
16.
ZubekJ. P.AftanasM.HasekJ.SansomW.SchludermannE.WilgoshL.WinocurG.Intellectual and perceptual changes during prolonged perceptual deprivation: Low illumination and noise level. Percept. mot. Skills, 1962, 15, 171–198. (Monogr. Suppl. 1-V15).
17.
ZubekJ. P.WelchG.SaundersM. G.EEG changes during and after 14 days of perceptual deprivation. Science, 1963, 139, 490–492.