Effect of Level of Activation on the Quality and Efficiency of Performance of Verbal and Motor Tasks

Abstract

The primary purpose of the study was to test an implication of Duffy's two-dimensional hypothesis that all behavior varies along two independent continua, direction and intensity. If true, then whether tension level correlates positively or negatively with performance on a given task should be dependent on whether S directs his attention and effort primarily to that task, or whether he shares his attention with some other task situation or set of cues which interferes with performance on the task being measured. Secondary purposes of the study were to gain further information as to which muscles are the most reliable and sensitive indicators of activation level, and to observe the effects of continuous and distributed practice on performance quality, tension level, and performance efficiency. Sixteen Ss performed a rotary tracking (motor) task while simultaneously performing a nonsense-syllable memorization (verbal) task under four incentive conditions. Incentive was varied to manipulate the amount and direction of attention and effort directed to each task. The results provided strong evidence that the relationship between tension level and performance is dependent upon the direction in which S exerts his effort, as well as its intensity. Performance efficiency, expressed as the ratio of performance quality to tension level (EMG), varied with incentive, length of continuous work, and degree of skill. The EMG level of neck muscle was more sensitive to, and changed more consistently with, variations in incentive than did that of any of the other muscles from which recordings were obtained (frontalis, trapezius, and forearm flexors). Frontalis muscle was least sensitive to incentive variations. The results suggest that frontalis muscle tension level is not as good an index of activation level as is that of the neck or of several muscles combined. EMG gradients observed during continuous performance of verbal and motor tasks were interpreted as indicative of a progressive increase in activation level resulting from a change in the psychological significance of the task situation as perceived by S.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bartoshuk

A. K.

Electromyographic gradients as indicants of motivation. Canad. J. Psychol., 1955, 9, 215–230. (a).

Bartoshuk

A. K.

Electromyographic gradients in goal directed activity. Canad. J. Psychol., 1955, 9, 21–28. (b).

Belanger

“Gradients” musculaires et processus mentaux superieurs. Canad. J. Psychol., 1957, 11, 113–122.

Bills

A. G.

Facilitation and inhibition in mental work. Psychol. Bull., 1937, 34, 286–309.

Courts

F. A.

Relations between experimentally induced muscular tension and memorization. J. exp. Psychol., 1939, 25, 235–256.

Courts

F. A.

Relations between muscular tension and performance. Psychol. Bull., 1942, 39, 347–367.

Davis

R. C.

Patterns of muscular activity during “mental work” and their constancy. J. exp. Psychol., 1939, 24, 451–465.

Duffy

The conceptual categories of psychology: A suggestion for revision. Psychol. Rev., 1941, 48, 177–203.

Duffy

A systematic framework for the description of personality. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1949, 44, 175–190.

10.

Duffy

The concept of energy mobilization. Psychol. Rev., 1951, 58, 30–40.

11.

Duffy

The psychological significance of the concept of “arousal” or “activation.”

Psychol. Rev., 1957, 64, 265–275.

12.

Duffy

Activation and behavior. New York: Wiley, 1962.

13.

Eason

R. G.

An electromyographic study of impairment and estimates of subjective effort associated with voluntary muscular contraction. San Diego 52, Calif.: U. S. Navy Electronics Laboratory, 22 May, 1959. (Res. & Dev. Rep. No. 898) (a).

14.

Eason

R. G.

The surface electromyogram (EMG) gauges subjective effort. Percept. mot. Skills, 1959, 9, 359–361. (b).

15.

Eason

R. G.

Electromyographic study of local and generalized muscular impairment. J. appl. Physiol., 1960, 15, 479–482.

16.

Eason

R. G.

Relationship between effort, tension level, skill, and performance efficiency in a perceptual-motor task. Percept. mot. Skills, 1963, 16, 297–317.

17.

Eason

R. G.

White

C. T.

Relationship between muscular tension and performance during rotary pursuit. Percept. mot. Skills, 1960, 10, 199–210.

18.

Eason

R. G.

White

C. T.

Muscular tension, effort, and tracking difficulty: Studies of parameters which affect tension level and performance efficiency. Percept. mot. Skills, 1961, 12, 331–372.

19.

Easterbrook

J. A.

The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychol. Rev., 1959, 66, 183–201.

20.

Freeman

G. L.

The relationship between performance level and bodily activity level. J. exp. Psychol., 1940, 26, 602–608.

21.

Hilgard

E. R.

Methods and procedures in the study of learning. In Stevens

S. S.

(Ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology. New York: Wiley, 1951. Pp. 517–568.

22.

Kennedy

J. L.

Travis

R. C.

Prediction of speed of performance by muscle action potentials. Science, 1947, 105, 410–411.

23.

Kennedy

J. L.

Travis

R. C.

Prediction and control of alertness: II. Continuous tracking. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1948, 41, 203–210.

24.

Lindsley

D. B.

Emotion. In Stevens

S. S.

(Ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology. New York: Wiley, 1951. Pp. 473–516.

25.

Lindsley

D. B.

Psychophysiology and motivation. In Jones

M. R.

(Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1957. Lincoln: Univer. Nebraska Press, 1957. Pp. 44–105.

26.

Lindsley

D. B.

Attention, consciousness, sleep and wakefulness. In Field

(Ed.), Handbook of physiology. Sect. I: Neurophysiology. Vol. 3. Washington, D.C.: Amer. Physiological Soc., 1960. Pp. 1553–1593.

27.

Magoun

H. W.

The waking brain. Springfield, Ill.: Thomas, 1958.

28.

Malmo

R. B.

Measurement of drive: An unsolved problem in psychology. In Jones

M. R.

(Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1958. Lincoln: Univer. of Nebraska Press, 1958. Pp. 229–264.

29.

Malmo

R. B.

Activation: A neuropsychological dimension. Psychol. Rev., 1959, 66, 367–386.

30.

Malmo

R. B.

Davis

J. F.

Physiological gradients as indicants of “arousal” in mirror tracing. Canad. J. Psychol., 1956, 10, 231–238.

31.

Meyer

D. R.

On the interaction of simultaneous responses. Psychol. Bull., 1953, 50, 204–220.

32.

Ryan

T. A.

Cottrell

C. L.

Bitterman

M. E.

Muscular tension as an index of effort: The effect of glare and other disturbances in visual work. Amer. J. Psychol., 1950, 63, 317–341.

33.

Shaw

W. A.

Facilitating effects of induced tension upon the perception span for digits. J. exp. Psychol., 1956, 51, 113–117.

34.

Smith

A. A.

An electromyographic study of tension in interrupted and completed tasks. J. exp. Psychol., 1953, 46, 32–36.

35.

Smith

A. A.

Malmo

R. B.

Shagass

An electromyographic study of listening and talking. Canad. J. Psychol., 1954, 8, 219–227.

36.

Stauffacher

J. C.

The effect of induced muscular tension upon various phases of the learning process. J. exp. Psychol., 1937, 21, 26–45.

37.

Stennett

R. G.

The relationship of performance level to level of arousal. J. exp. Psychol., 1957, 54, 54–60.

38.

Surwillo

W. W.

Psychological factors in muscle action potentials: EMG gradients. J. exp. Psychol., 1956, 52, 263–272.

39.

Travis

R. C.

Kennedy

J. L.

Prediction and automatic control of alertness: I. Control of lookout alertness. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1947, 40, 457–461.

40.

Travis

R. C.

Kennedy

J. L.

Prediction and control of alertness: III. Calibration of the alertness indicator and further results. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1949, 42, 45–57.

41.

Wallerstein

An electromyographic study of attentive listening. Canad. J. Psychol., 1954, 8, 228–238.

42.

Woodworth

R. S.

Schlosberg

Experimental psychology. New York: Holt, 1954.