AmmonsR. B.Acquisition of motor skill: I. Quantitative analysis and theoretical formulation. Psychol. Rev., 1947, 54, 263–281.
2.
DavisJ. F.Manual of surface electromyography. Montreal: Laboratory for Psychological Studies, Allan Memorial Institute, McGill University, 1952. (Mimeo.).
3.
DuffyE.The psychological significance of the concept of “arousal” or “activation.”Psychol. Rev., 1957, 64, 265–275.
4.
EasonR. G.An electromyographic study of impairment and estimates of subjective effort associated with voluntary contraction. (Res. & Dev. Rep. No. 898) San Diego, Calif.: U. S. Navy Electronics Laboratory, 1959.
5.
EasonR. G.WhiteC. T.Relationship between muscular tension and performance during rotary pursuit. Percept. mot. Skills, 1960, 10, 199–210.
6.
EasonR. G.WhiteC. T.Muscular tension, effort, and tracking difficulty: Studies of parameters which affect tension level and performance efficiency. Percept. mot. Skills, 1961, 12, 331–372.
7.
GhiselliE.Changes in neuro-muscular tension accompanying the performance of a learning problem involving constant choice time. J. exp. Psychol., 1936, 19, 91–98.
8.
LewinK.DemboT.FestingerL.SearsP.Level of aspiration. In HuntJ. McV. (Ed.), Personality and the behavior disorders. Vol. I. New York: Ronald, 1944. Pp. 333–378.
9.
LindsleyD. B.Emotion. In StevensS. S. (Ed.), Handbook of experimental psychology. New York: Wiley, 1951. Pp. 473–516.
10.
MalmoR. B.Measurement of drive: An unsolved problem in psychology. In JonesM. R. (Ed.), Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 1958. Lincoln: Univer. Nebr. Press, 1958. Pp. 229–265.
11.
MalmoR. B.Activation: A neuropsychological dimension. Psychol. Rev., 1959, 66, 367–386.
12.
WoodworthR. S.SchlosbergH.Experimental psychology. New York: Holt, 1954.