AmmonsC. H.AmmonsR. B.How to prevent genius: McCurdy revisited. Proc. Mont. Acad. Sci., 1962, 21, 145–152.
2.
AmmonsR. B.Toward a technology of intellectual originality and creativity. Proc. Mont. Acad. Sci., 1962, 21, 153–159.
3.
AmmonsR. B.AmmonsC. H.ESP and PK: A way out?North Dakota Quart., 1957, 25, 119–121.
4.
AmmonsR. B.AmmonsC. H.How to foster genius: McCurdy extended. Proc. Mont. Acad. Sci., 1962, 21, 138–144.
5.
BakanD.Learning and the scientific enterprise. Psychol. Rev., 1953, 60, 45–49.
6.
BeveridgeW. I. B.The art of scientific investigation. New York: Norton, 1950.
7.
BoringE. G.Was this analysis a success?J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1940, 35, 4–10.
8.
BoringE. G.LangfeldH. S.WernerH.YerkesR. M. (Eds.) A history of psychology in autobiography. Vol. IV. Worcester: Clark Univer. Press, 1952.
9.
BrogdenW. J.The experimenter as a factor in animal conditioning. Psychol. Rep., 1962, 11, 239–242.
10.
ChambersR. M.The social organization of some science research apprentices in scientific, recreational, and routine-work activities. Psychol. Rep., 1955, 1, 401–408.
11.
CliffordP. I.Emotional contacts with the external world manifested by a selected group of highly creative chemists and mathematicians. Percept. mot. Skills, 1958, 8, 3–26.
12.
ComptonA. H.Case histories: Creativity in science. In OlsenF. (Ed.), The nature of creative thinking. (2nd ed.) New York: New York Univer. Press, n. d., Pp. 23–30.
13.
CoxC. M.The early mental traits of three hundred geniuses. Palo Alto: Stanford Univer. Press, 1926.
14.
EidusonB. T.Scientists: Their psychological world. New York: Basic Books, 1962.
15.
GuilfordJ. P.The relation of intellectual factors to creative thinking in science. In TaylorC. W. (Ed.), The 1955 University of Utah Research Conference on the Identification of Creative Scientific Talent. Salt Lake City: Univer. of Utah Press, 1956. Pp. 69–95.
16.
HunterW. S.Research interests in psychology. Amer. J. Psychol., 1952, 65, 627–632.
17.
KubieL. S.Some unsolved problems of the scientific career. Part I. Amer. Scientist, 1953, 41, 596–613. Part II. Amer. Scientist, 1954, 42, 104–112.
18.
LynnD. B.The organism as a manufacturer of theories. Psychol. Rep., 1957, 3, 353–359.
19.
McCurdyH. G.The childhood pattern of genius. In Annual Report (1958) of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution. Publ. 4354. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Gov't. Printing Office, 1959. Pp. 527–542.
20.
(Reprinted from MitchellElisha J.Scientific Soc., 1957, 73, No. 2. Also published as a separate, Smithsonian Publication 4373.).
21.
Operations Research Group, Case Institute of Technology, An operations research study of the dissemination and use of recorded scientific information. Washington, D.C.: U. S. Department of Commerce, 1960. (PB 171 503).
22.
PelzD. C.Analysis memos from study of scientific personnel. Nos. 1–6. Ann Arbor: Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, Univer. of Michigan, 1961.
23.
RoeA.The making of a scientist. New York: Dodd, Mead, 1952.
24.
RosenthalR.PersingerG. W.FodeK. L.Experimenter bias, anxiety, and social desirability. Percept. mot. Skills, 1962, 15, 73–74.
25.
SidmanM.Tactics of scientific research. New York: Basic Books, 1960.
26.
TaylorC. W. (Ed.) The 1955 University of Utah Research Conference on the Identification of Creative Scientific Talent. Salt Lake City: Univer. of Utah Press, 1956.