AikenC. M.The relationship between critical flicker frequency and several psychological variables. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univer. of Florida, 1954.
2.
AmmonsR. B.Experiential factors in visual form perception: I. Review and formulation of problems. J. genet. Psychol., 1954, 84, 3–25.
3.
BeckerW. C.Perceptual rigidity as measured by aniseikonic lenses. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1954, 49, 419–422.
4.
BeckerW. C.Cortical inhibition and extraversion-introversion. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1960, 61, 52–66.
5.
BenderM.TeuberH. L.Disturbances in visual perception following cerebral lesion. J. Psychol., 1949, 28, 223–233.
BergerD.EversonR.RutledgeL.KoskoffY. D.The spiral aftereffect in a neurological setting. J. consult. Psychol., 1958, 22, 249–255.
8.
BlakeR. R.RamseyG. V.Perception: An approach to personality. New York: Ronald, 1951.
9.
BrunerJ. S.GoodmanC. C.Value and need as organizing factors in perception. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1947, 42, 33–44.
10.
BrunerJ. S.KrechD. (Eds.) Perception and personality: A symposium. Durham, N. C.: Duke Univer., 1950.
11.
CattellR. B.Principles of design in “projective” or misperception tests of personality. In AndersonH. H.AndersonG. L. (Eds.), An introduction to projective techniques. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, 1951. Pp. 55–98.
12.
ChristmanR. J.Figural aftereffects utilizing apparent movement as inspection figure. Amer. J. Psychol., 1953, 66, 66–72.
13.
ChristmanR. J.Shifts in pitch as a function of prolonged stimulation with pure tones. Amer. J. Psychol., 1954, 67, 484–491.
14.
ChyatteC.The relation of cortical potential to perceptual functions. Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 1954, 50, 184–226.
15.
ColganC. M.Critical flicker frequency, age, and intelligence. Amer. J. Psychol., 1954, 67, 711–713.
16.
CoppingerN. W.The relationship between critical flicker frequency and chronologic age for varying levels of stimulus brightness. J. Geront., 1955, 10, 48–52.
17.
CrutchfieldR. S.EdwardsW.The effect of a fixated figure on autokinetic movement. J. exp. Psychol., 1949, 39, 561–568.
18.
DeatherageB. H.Figural aftereffects and stroboscopic movement. Amer. J. Psychol., 1954, 67, 259–267.
19.
DeatherageB. H.BittermanM. E.The effect of satiation on stroboscopic movement. Amer. J. Psychol., 1952, 65, 108–109.
20.
DeutschJ. A.A preliminary report on a new auditory aftereffect. Quart. J. exp. Psychol., 1951, 3, 43–46.
21.
DuncanC. P.On the similarity between reactive inhibition and neural satiation. Amer. J. Psychol., 1956, 69, 227–235.
22.
Educational Testing Service. The Scholastic Aptitude Test. Princeton: Author, 1958.
23.
EdwardsW.CrutchfieldR. S.Differential reduction of autokinetic movement by a fixated figure. J. exp. Psychol., 1951, 42, 25–31.
24.
EysenckH. J.Cortical inhibition, figural aftereffect, and the theory of personality. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1955, 51, 94–106.
25.
EysenckH. J.GrangerG. W.BrengelmannJ. C.Perceptual processes and mental illness. New York: Basic Books, 1957.
26.
GalleseA. J.The spiral afterimage as a test of organic brain damage. J. clin. Psychol., 1956, 12, 254.
KleinG. S.KrechD.Cortical conductivity in the brain-injured. J. Pers., 1952, 21, 118–148.
39.
KoehlerW.Dynamics in psychology. New York: Liveright, 1940.
40.
KoehlerW.Relational determination in perception. In JeffressL. A. (Ed.), Cerebral mechanisms in behavior; The Hixon Symposium. New York: Wiley, 1951. Pp. 200–243.
41.
KoehlerW.FishbackJ.The destruction of the Mueller-Lyer illusion in repeated trials: 1. An examination of two theories. J. exp. Psychol., 1950, 40, 267–281. (a).
42.
KoehlerW.FishbackJ.The destruction of the Mueller-Lyer illusion in repeated trials: 2. Satiation patterns and memory traces. J. exp. Psychol., 1950, 40, 398–410. (b).
43.
KoehlerW.WallachH.Figural aftereffects: An investigation of visual processes. Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc., 1944, 88, 269–357.
44.
KorotkinA. L.Perception and intelligence: The relationship of certain visual-perceptual skills with intelligence, age, and sex. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Temple Univer., 1960.
45.
KrauskopfJ.Figural aftereffects in auditory space. Amer. J. Psychol., 1954, 67, 684–690.
46.
LandisC.Something about flicker-fusion. Sci. Month., 1951, 73, 308–314.
47.
LandisC.Determinants of the critical flicker fusion threshold. Physiol. Rev., 1954, 34, 259–286.
48.
LashleyK. S.Brain mechanisms and intelligence. Chicago: Univer. Chicago, 1929.
49.
LewinK.A dynamic theory of personality. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1935.
50.
LivsonN. H.Aftereffects of prolonged inspection of apparent movement. Amer. J. Psychol., 1953, 66, 365–376.
51.
LivsonN. H.KrechD.Dynamic systems, rote learning, and retroactive inhibition. J. Pers., 1955, 24, 2–19.
52.
McClearyR. A.LazarusR. S.Autonomic discrimination without awareness. J. Pers., 1949, 18, 171–179.
53.
McEwenP.Figural aftereffects. Brit. J. Psychol. Monogr. Suppl., 1958, No. 31.
54.
McGinniesE.Emotionality and perceptual defense. Psychol. Rev., 1949, 56, 244–251.
55.
MeierM.The interrelationships among MMPI variables, kinesthetic aftereffects, and reminiscence in a motor learning task. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univer. of Wisconsin, 1956.
56.
NemorN.The alternation of an ambiguous figure in paretics and schizophrenics. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1953, 48, 445–447.
57.
PageH. A.RakitaG.KaplanH. K.SmithN. B.Another application of the spiral aftereffect in the determination of brain damage. J. consult. Psychol., 1957, 21, 89–91.
58.
PavlovI. P.Lectures on conditioned reflexes. New York: International Univer. Publishers, 1941.
59.
PembertonC.The closure factors related to temperament. J. Pers., 1952, 21, 159–175.
60.
PriceA. C.DeablerH. L.Diagnosis of organicity by means of spiral aftereffect. J. consult. Psychol., 1955, 19, 299–302.
61.
RaoC. R.Estimation and tests of significance in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 1955, 20, 93–111.
62.
RechtschaffenA.Neural satiation, reactive inhibition, and introversion-extraversion. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1958, 57, 283–291.
RogersC. R.Client-centered therapy: Its current practice, implications, and theory. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1951.
65.
SaucerR. T.A further study of the perception of apparent motion by schizophrenics. J. consult. Psychol., 1958, 22, 256–258.
66.
SaucerR. T.DeablerH. L.Apparent movement in organic and schizophrenic patients. J. consult. Psychol., 1956, 20, 385–389.
67.
SchaferR.MurphyG.The role of autism in a visual figure-ground relationship. J. exp. Psychol., 1943, 32, 335–343.
68.
ShapiroM. B.A preliminary investigation of the effects of continuous stimulation in the perception of apparent movement. Brit. J. Psychol., 1954, 45, 58–67.
69.
SnyggD.CombsA. W.Individual behavior. New York: Harper, 1949.
70.
SpitzH. H.Neural satiation in the spiral aftereffect and similar movement aftereffects. Percept. mot. Skills, 1958, 8, 207–213.
71.
SpitzH. H.BlackmanL. S.The Mueller-Lyer illusion in retardates and normals. Percept. mot. Skills, 1958, 8, 219–225.
72.
SpitzH. H.BlackmanL. S.A comparison of mental retardates and normals on visual figural aftereffects and reversible figures. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1959, 58, 105–110.
73.
SpivackG.LevineM.The spiral aftereffect and reversible figures as measures of brain damage and memory. J. Pers., 1957, 25, 767–778.
74.
TannerW. P.A preliminary investigation of the relationship between visual fusion of intermittent light and intelligence. Science, 1950, 112, 201.
75.
TermanL.The Concept Mastery Test. New York: Psychological Corp., 1956.
76.
TeuberH. L.BenderM.Alteration in pattern vision following trauma of occipital lobes in man. J. gen. Psychol., 1948, 40, 35–57.
77.
TeuberH. L.BenderM.Perception of apparent movement across acquired scotomata in the visual field. Amer. Psychologist, 1950, 5, 271. (Abstract).
78.
ThurstoneL. L.A factorial study of perception. Chicago: Univer. of Chicago, 1944.
79.
VothA. C.Individual differences in the autokinetic phenomenon. J. exp. Psychol., 1941, 29, 306–322.
80.
VothA. C.An experimental study of mental patients through the autokinetic phenomenon. Amer. J. Psychiat., 1947, 103, 793–805.
81.
WeiskrantzL.Figural aftereffects in stroboscopic motion. Quart. J. exp. Psychol., 1950, 2, 113–118.
82.
WernerH.ThumaB. D.A deficiency in the perception of apparent motion in children with brain injury. Amer. J. Psychol., 1942, 55, 58–67. (a).
83.
WernerH.ThumaB. D.Critical flicker-frequency in children with brain injury. Amer. J. Psychol., 1942, 55, 394–399. (b).
84.
WertheimerM.The differential satiability of schizophrenic and normal subjects: A test of a deduction from the theory of figural aftereffects. J. gen. Psychol., 1954, 51, 291–299.
85.
WertheimerM.Figural aftereffects as a measure of metabolic efficiency. J. Pers., 1955, 24, 56–73.
86.
WertheimerM.AronsonE.Personality rigidity as measured by aniseikonic lenses and by perceptual tests of metabolic efficiency. J. gen. Psychol., 1958, 58, 41–49.
87.
WertheimerM.JacksonC. W.Jr.Figural aftereffects, “brain modifiability,” and schizophrenia: A further study. J. gen. Psychol., 1957, 57, 45–54.
88.
WertheimerM.LevineH.WertheimerN.The effect of experimentally induced changes in metabolism on perceptual measures of metabolic efficiency. Percept. mot. Skills, 1955, 5, 173–176.
89.
WertheimerM.WertheimerN.A metabolic interpretation of individual differences in figural aftereffects. Psychol. Rev., 1954, 61, 279–280.
90.
WitkinH. A.LewisH. B.HertzmanM.MachoverK.MessnerP. B.WapnerS.Personality through perception. New York: Harper, 1954.
91.
YoungK. M.Critical flicker frequency. In MettlerF. A. (Ed.), Selective partial ablation of the frontal cortex. New York: Hoeber, 1949. Pp. 257–263.