AttneaveF.Physical determinants of the judged complexity of shapes. J. exp. Psychol., 1957, 53, 221–227.
2.
AttneaveF.ArnoultM. D.The quantitative study of shape and pattern perception. Psychol. Bull., 1956, 53, 452–471.
3.
BrownD. R.HitchcockL.Jr.MichelsK. M.Quantitative studies in form perception: An evaluation of the role of selected stimulus parameters in the visual discrimination performance of human subjects. Percept. mot. Skills, 1962, 14, 519–529.
4.
DeeseJ.Complexity of contour in the recognition of visual form. USAF WADC Tech. Rep., 1956, No. 56-60.
5.
DodwellP. C.BessantD. E.The squirrel as an experimental animal; some tests of visual capacity. Canad. J. Psychol., 1961, 15, 226–236.
6.
JohnsonJ. I.MichelsK. M.Learning sets and object-size effects in visual discrimination learning by raccoons. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1958, 51, 376–379. (a).
7.
JohnsonJ. I.MichelsK. M.Discrimination of small intervals and objects by raccoons. Anim. Bebav., 1958, 6, 164–170. (b).
8.
LashleyK. S.The mechanism of vision: I. A method for rapid analysis of patternvision in the rat. J. genet. Psychol., 1930, 37, 453–460.
9.
MichelsK. M.BrownD. R.The delayed-response performance of raccoons. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1959, 52, 737–740.
10.
MichelsK. M.PustekJ.JohnsonJ. I.The solution of patterned-string tests by raccoons. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1961, 54, 439–441.
11.
VanderplasJ. M.GarvinE. A.The association value of random shapes. J. exp. Psychol., 1959, 57, 147–154. (a).
12.
VanderplasJ. M.GarvinE. A.Complexity, association value, and practice as factors in shape recognition following paired-associates training. J. exp. Psychol., 1959, 57, 155–163. (b).