Visual-Motor Capacities and Ocular Efficiency in Reading

Abercrombie M. L. J. Perception and eye movement. Cerebral Palsy Bull., 1960, 2, 142–148.

Anderson I. H. Studies in the eye movements of good and poor readers. Psychol. Monogr., 1937, 48, No. 3 (Whole No. 215).

Bender L. Instructions for the use of Visual Motor-Gestalt Test. New York: American Ortho-Psychiatric Assn, 1946.

Benton A. L. The Revised Visual Retention Test: Clinical and experimental applications. Iowa City, Ia.: State Univer. of Iowa, 1955.

Berner; G. Berner D. Relation of ocular dominance, handedness, and the controlling eye in binocular vision. Arch. Ophthalmol., 1953, 50, 603–608.

Bond G. L. Tinker M. A. Reading difficulties: Their diagnosis and correction. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1957.

Carmichael E. A. Dix M. R. Hallpike C. S. Cerebral hemisphere lesions and their effect on optokinetic nystagmus and caloric nystagmus. Brain, 1954, 77, 345–355.

Cruickshank W. M. Bice H. V. Wallen N. L. Perception and cerebral palsy. Syracuse, N. Y.: Syracuse Univer. Press, 1957.

Davidson H. An experimental study of bright, average and dull children at the 4-year mental level. Genet. psychol. Monogr., 1931, 9, 119–289.

Dearborn W. F. The psychology of reading: An experimental study of the reading pauses and movements of the eyes. Columbia Univer. Contr. to Phil., Psychol., Educ., 1906, 14, No. 1.

Dearborn W. F. The nature of special abilities and disabilities. Sch. & Soc., 1930, 31, 632–636.

Delacato C. H. The treatment and prevention of reading problems. Springfield, Ill.: Thomas, 1959.

Deputy E. C. Predicting first grade reading achievement. Columbia Univer. Contr. to Educ., 1930, 61, No. 426.

Dodge R. Cline T. The angle velocity for eye movements. Psychol. Rev., 1901, 8, 145–157.

Fabian A. A. Vertical rotation in visual-motor performance: Its relationship to reading reversals. J. educ. Psychol., 1945, 36, 129–154.

Fink W. H. The dominant eye, its clinical significance. Arch. Ophthalmol., 1938, 19, 555–582.

Gates A. I. A study of the role of visual perception, intelligence, and certain associative processes in reading and spelling. J. educ. Psychol., 1926, 18, 433–445.

Gates A. I. The improvement of reading. (3rd ed.) New York: Macmillan, 1950.

Gates A. I. Bond G. Reading readiness: A study of factors determining success and failure in beginning reading. Teachers' Coll. Rec., 1936, 37, 679–686.

Gilbert L. C. Functional motor efficiency of the eyes and its relation to reading. Univer. Calif. Publ. Educ., 1953, 11, 159–232.

Gilbert L. C. Saccadic movements as a factor in visual perception in reading. J. educ. Psychol., 1959, 50, 15–19.

Gilbert L. C. Gilbert D. Reading before the eye movement camera and away from it. Elem. Sch. J., 1942, 42, 443–447.

Goldberg L. R. The effectiveness of clinician's judgments: The diagnosis of organic brain damage from the Bender-Gestalt test. J. consult. Psychol., 1959, 23, 25–33.

Graham F. K. Kendall B. S. Memory-for-Designs test: Revised general manual. Percept. mot. Skills, 1960, 11, 147–188.

Gray C. T. Types of reading ability as exhibited through tests and laboratory experiments. Suppl., Educ. Monogr., 1917, 1, No. 5.

Harrington S. M. J., & Durrell, D. D. Mental maturity versus perception abilities in primary reading. J. educ. Psychol., 1955, 46, 375–380.

Harris A. J. How to increase reading ability. (3rd ed.) New York: Longmans, Green, 1956.

Hinshelwood J. A case of “word” without “letter” blindness. Lancet, 1898, 1, 422–425.

Hinshelwood J. “Letter” without “word” blindness. Lancet, 1899, 1, 83–86.

Hinshelwood J. Congenital word blindness. London: H. K. Lewis, 1900. (a).

Hinshelwood J. Congenital word-blindness. Lancet, 1900, 2, 1506–1508. (b).

Hinshelwood J. Letter, word, and mind blindness. London: H. K. Lewis, 1900.

(c) Hinshelwood J. Four cases of word-blindness. Lancet, 1902, 1, 358–363.

Hinshelwood J. A case of congenital word-blindness. Brit. med. J., 1904, 2, 1303–1304.

Hinshelwood J. Four cases of congenital word-blindness occuring in the same family. Brit. med. J., 1907, 2, 1229–1232.

Hinshelwood J. Two cases of hereditary congenital word-blindness. Brit. med. J., 1911, 1, 608–609.

Hinshelwood J. The treatment of word-blindness acquired and congenital. Brit. med. J., 1912, 2, 1033–1035.

Jastak J. Wide Range Achievement Test. Wilmington, Del.: Story, 1946.

Javel E. Essai sur la physiologie de la lecture. Annu.-d'Oculist, 1879, 81, 61–73.

Johnson M. S. Factors related to disability in reading. J. exp. Educ., 1957, 26, 1–26.

Johnson P. W. The relation of certain anomalies of vision and lateral dominance to reading disability. Monogr. Soc. Res. Child Developm., 1942, 7, No. 2.

Judd C. H. Buswell G. T. Silent reading: A study of the various types. Suppl., Educ. Monogr., 1922, 13, No. 23.

Kerr J. School hygiene in its mental, moral, and physical aspects. J. statist. Soc., 1897, 60, 613–680.

Lennon R. The relation between intelligence and achievement test results for a group of communities. J. educ. Res., 1950, 41, 301.

Luckiesh M. Light, vision, and seeing. New York: Van Nostrand, 1944.

Macmecken A. M. Ocular dominance in relation to developmental aphasia. London: Univer. of London Press, 1939.

Manolakes G. Sheldon W. D. The relation between reading test scores and language-factors intelligence quotients. Elem. Sch. J., 1955, 55, 346–350.

Monroe M. Children who cannot read. Chicago: Univer. of Chicago Press, 1932.

Morgan W. P. Congenital word blindness. Brit. med. J., 1896, 2, 1612.

Nila Sister M.O.S.F. Foundations of a successful reading program. Educ., 1953, 73, 543–555.

Orton S. T. An impediment to learning to read; a neurological explanation of the reading disability. Sch. & Soc., 1928, 28, 286–290.

Park G. E. Reading difficulty (Dyslexia) from the ophthalmic point of view. Amer. J. Ophthalmol., 1948, 31, 28–34.

Pascal G. R. Suttell B. J. The Bender-Gestalt Test. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1951.

Rabinovitch R. D. Drew A. J. DeJong R. N. Ingram W. Withey L. A research approach to reading retardation. In McIntosh R. Hare C. C. (Eds.), Neurology and psychiatry in childhood. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1954. Ch. 4.

Radler D. H. Visual training hopeful—now Johnny can read. Horizon, 1956, 3, 13–18.

Raven J. C. Guide to using the Progressive Matrices. London: H. K. Lewis, 1947.

Remond A. Gabercek V. Approache d'une semeiologie electrographique du regard. Rev. Neurol., 1957, 96, 536–546.

Schonell F. J. Backwardness in the basic subjects. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd, 1942.

Selzer C. A. Lateral dominance and visual fusion, their application to difficulties in reading, writing, spelling, and speech. Harvard Monogr. Educ., 1933, No. 12.

Siegel S. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.

Smith D. E. Carrigan P. M. The nature of reading disability. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1959.

Strauss A. Lehtinen L. Psychopathology and education of the brain-injured child. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1947.

Taylor E. A. Controlled reading: A correlation of diagnostic teaching and corrective techniques. Chicago: Univer. of Chicago Press, 1937.

Terman L. M. Merrill M. A. Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scale. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1960.

Thomas C. J. Congenital “word blindness” and its treatment. The Ophthalmoscope, 1905, 3, 380–385.

Tiegs E. W. Clark W. W. Manual for California Achievement Tests, Complete Battery. Los Angeles: Calif. Test Bureau, 1957.

Tinker M. A. Diagnostic and remedial reading. Elem. Sch. J., 1932, 33, 293–307.

Tinker M. A. Eye movements in reading. J. educ. Res., 1936, 30, 241–277.

Tinker M. A. The study of eye movements in reading. Psychol. Bull., 1946, 43, 93–120.

Torpe H. Psykologiske betragtninger ober begynderundervisningen: I. Laesning. Nordiske Staevne for Laesepaedagoger, 1954, 2, 33–40.

Vernon M. D. Backwardness in reading: A study of its nature and origin. Cambridge: Cambridge Univer. Press, 1957.

Wallin J. E. Congenital word blindness. Lancet, 1921, 1, 890–892.

Werner H. Thuma B. Critical-flicker-frequency in children with brain injury. Amer. J. Psychol., 1942, 55, 394–399. (a).

Werner H. Thuma B. A deficiency in perception of apparent motion in children with brain damage. Amer. J. Psychol., 1942, 55, 58–67. (b).