Duke-ElderW. S.SirTextbook of ophthalmology. Vol.1. London: Henry Kimpton, 1938.
2.
HeldR.Exposure-history as a factor in maintaining stability of perception and coordination. J. nerv. ment. Dis., 1961, 132, 26–31.
3.
MachE.The analysis of sensations. New York: Dover, 1959.
4.
MannC. W.DauteriveH. J.The perception of the postural vertical. Rep. No. 1: The modification of non-labyrinthine cues. Joint Project Report No. 4, Tulane University, Project NR 140-455-037, School of Aviation Medicine, Project NM 001, 1949.
5.
Von HolstE.MittelstaedtH.Das Reafferenzprinzip. Die Naturwiss., 1950, 20, 464–476.
6.
Von HolstE.Relations between the central nervous system and the peripheral organs. Brit. J. anim. Behav., 1954, 2, 89–94.
7.
WapnerS.WernerH.Perceptual development. Worcester, Mass.: Clark Univer. Press, 1957.
8.
WernerH.WapnerS.Toward a general theory of perception. Psychol. Rev., 1952, 59, 324–338. (b).
9.
WernerH.WapnerS.Experiments on sensory-tonic field theory of perception: V. Effect of body status on the kinaesthetic perception of verticality. J. exp. Psychol., 1952, 44, 126–131. (a).
10.
WernerH.WapnerS.Sensory-tonic field theory of perception: Basic concepts and experiments. Rev. di psicol., 1956, 50, 315–337.
11.
WernerH.WapnerS.ChandlerK.A. Experiments on sensory-tonic field theory of perception: II. Effect of supported and unsupported tilt of the body on the visual perception of verticality. J. exp. Psychol., 1951, 42, 346–350.
12.
WitkinH. A.Perception of body position and of the position of the visual field. Psychol. Monogr., 1949, 63, No. 7 (Whole No. 302).