Influence of Neuromotor Program Alteration on the Speed of a Standard Arm Movement

Abstract

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bachman

J. C.

Specificity vs. generality in learning and performing two large muscle motor tasks. Res. Quart., 1961, 32, 3–11.

Clarke

D. H.

Correlation between the strength/mass ratio and the speed of an arm movement. Res. Quart., 1960, 31, 570–574.

Clarke

D. H.

Henry

F. M.

Neuromotor specificity and increased speed from strength development. Res. Quart., 1961, 32, 315–325.

Henry

F. M.

Factorial structure of speed and static strength in a lateral arm movement. Res. Quart., 1960, 31, 440–447. (a).

Henry

F. M.

Increased response latency for complicated movements and a “memory drum” theory of neuromotor reaction. Res. Quart., 1960, 31, 448–458. (b).

Henry

F. M.

Reaction time-movement time correlation. Percept. mot. Skills, 1961, 12, 63–66.

Henry

F. M.

Harrison

J. S.

Refractoriness of a fast movement. Percept. mot. Skills, 1961, 13, 351–354.

Henry

F. M.

Smith

L. E.

Simultaneous vs. separate bilateral muscular contractions in relation to neural overflow theory and neuromotor specificity. Res. Quart., 1961, 32, 42–46.

Henry

F. M.

Whitley

J. D.

Relationships between individual differences in strength, speed and mass in an arm movement. Res. Quart., 1960, 31, 24–33.

10.

Lotter

W. S.

Specificity or generality of speed of systematically related movements. Res. Quart., 1961, 32, 55–62.

11.

Rasch

P. J.

Relationship of arm-strength, weight and length to speed of movement. Res. Quart., 1954, 25, 328–332.

12.

Smith

L. E.

Individual differences in strength, reaction latency, mass and length of limbs, and their relation to maximal speed of movement. Res. Quart., 1961, 32, 208–220. (a).

13.

Smith

L. E.

Relationship between explosive leg strength and performance in the vertical jump. Res. Quart., 1961, 32, 405–408. (b).