AdamsJ. A.Psychomotor performance as a function of intertrial rest interval. J. exp. Psychol., 1954, 48, 131–133.
2.
ArcherE. J.Post-rest performance in motor learning as a function of pre-rest degree of distribution of practice. J. exp. Psychol., 1954, 47, 47–51.
3.
ArcherE. J.BourneL. E.Inverted-alphabet printing as a function of intertrial rest and sex. J. exp. Psychol., 1956, 52, 322–328.
4.
BousfieldW. A.SedgewickC. H.W. An analysis of sequences of restricted associative responses. J. gen. Psychol., 1944, 30, 149–165.
5.
KientzleM. J.Properties of learning curves under varied distributions of practice. J. exp. Psychol., 1946, 36, 187–211.
6.
KimbleG. A.Performance and reminiscence in motor learning as a function of the degree of distribution of practice. J. exp. Psychol., 1949, 39, 500–510.
7.
ReynoldsB.AdamsJ. A.Effect of distribution and shift in distribution of practice within a single training session. J. exp. Psychol., 1953, 46, 137–145.
8.
RollinA. R.ZeamanD.Test of the reinforcing aspect of trial completion in the inverted alphabet task. Percept. mot. Skills, 1956, 6, 213–216.
9.
SchuckerR. E.StevensL. B.EllisD. S.A retest for conditioned inhibition in the alphabet-printing task. J. exp. Psychol., 1953, 46, 97–102.
10.
SilverR. J.Effect of amount and distribution of warming-up activity on retention in motor learning. J. exp. Psychol., 1952, 44, 88–95.
11.
WassermanH. N.The effect of motivation and amount of pre-rest practice upon inhibitory potential in motor learning. J. exp. Psychol., 1951, 42, 162–172.
12.
ZeamanD.KaufmanH.Individual differences and theory in a motor learning task. Psychol. Monogr., 1955, 69, No. 6 (Whole No. 391).
