Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 1962-6
Quantitative Studies in Form Perception: An Evaluation of the Role of Selected Stimulus Parameters in the Visual Discrimination Performance of Human Subjects
ArnoultM. D.Shape discrimination as a function of the angular orientation of the stimuli. J. exp. Psychol., 1954, 47, 323–328.
2.
ArnoultM. D.Toward a psychophysics of form. In WulfeckJ. W. & TaylorJ. H. (Eds.), Form discrimination as related to military problems. Washington: Nat. Res. Council., 1957. (Publ. No. 561) Pp. 38–42.
3.
AttneaveF.Physical determinants of the judged complexity of shapes. J. exp. Psychol., 1957, 52, 221–227.
4.
AttneaveF.Application of information theory to psychology. New York: Holt, 1959.
5.
AttneaveF., & ArnoultM. D.The quantitative study of shape and pattern perception. Psychol. Bull., 1956, 53, 452–471.
6.
BrickerP. D.Information measurement and reaction time. In QuastlerH. (Ed.), Information theory in psychology: problems and methods. Glencoe, Ill.: Free Press, 1955. Pp. 350–359.
7.
CrookM. N.Facsimile-generated analogues for instrumental displays. In WulfeckJ. W. & TaylorJ. H. (Ed.), Form discrimination as related to military problems. Washington: Nat. Res. Council, 1957. (Publ. No. 561) Pp. 85–98.
8.
DeeseJ.Complexity of contour in the recognition of visual form. USAF WADC Tech. Rep., 1956, No. 56-60.
9.
DuncanD. B.Multiple-range and multiple-F tests. Biometrics, 1955, 11, 1–42.
10.
EdelmanS. K.Analysis of some stimulus factors involved in the associative response. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue Univer., 1960.
11.
EdelmanS. K.KarasG. G., & CohenB. J.The relative contributions of complexity and symmetry to the perception of form. Paper presented at Midwest. Psychol. Assn, Chicago, 1961.
12.
FrenchR. S.Identification of dot patterns from memory as a function of complexity. J. exp. Psychol., 1954, 47, 22–26.
13.
HitchcockL.Jr.Comparative studies of the contribution of areal asymmetry, rotation, and sidedness to form discrimination. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue Univer., 1961.
14.
MillerG. A.The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol. Rev., 1956, 63, 81–97.
15.
PittmanG.Form discrimination and learning set formation by two species of Sciurus as a function of quantitatively controlled stimulus parameters. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Purdue Univer., 1959.
16.
VanderplasJ. M., & GarvinE. A.The association value of random shapes. J. exp. Psychol., 1959, 57, 147–154. (a)
17.
VanderplasJ. M., & GarvinE. A.Complexity, association value, and practice as factors in shape recognition following paired-associate training. J. exp. Psychol., 1959, 57, 155–163. (b)
18.
WeinsteinM.Stimulus complexity and the recognition of visual patterns. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Ohio State Univer., 1955.