CroslandH. R.TaylorH. R., & NewsomS. J.Intelligence and susceptibility to the Mueller-Lyer illusion. J. exp. Psychol., 1927, 10, 40–51.
4.
DunlapK.The effect of imperceptible shadows on the judgment of distance. Psychol. Rev., 1900, 7, 435–453.
5.
EriksenC. W.An experimental analysis of subception. Amer. J. Psychol., 1956, 69, 625–634.
6.
EriksenC. W.Prediction from and interaction among multiple concurrent discriminative responses. J. exp. Psychol., 1957, 53, 353–359.
7.
GoldiamondI.Indicators of perception: I. Subliminal perception, subception, unconscious perception: an analysis in terms of psychophysical indicator methodology. Psychol. Bull., 1958, 55, 373–411.
8.
HowesD.A statistical theory of the phenomenon of subception. Psychol. Rev., 1954, 61, 98–110.
9.
LazarusR. S., & McClearyR. A.Autonomic discrimination without awareness: a study of subception. Psychol. Rev., 1951, 58, 113–122.
10.
McGinniesE.Emotionality and perceptual defense. Psychol. Rev., 1949, 56, 244–251.
11.
SmithW. G.A study of some correlations of the Mueller-Lyer visual illusion and allied phenomena. Brit. J. Psychol., 1906, 2, 16–51.
12.
TitchenerE. B., & PyleW. H.The effect of imperceptible shadows on the judgment of distance. Proc. Amer. Phil. Soc., 1907, 46, 94–109. Also, Amer. J. Psychol., 1907, 18, 388.
13.
UrbanF. M.The application of statistical methods to the problems of psychophysics. Philadelphia: Psychological Clinic Press, 1908.
14.
VoorJ. H.Subliminal perception and subception. J. Psychol., 1956, 41, 437–458.
15.
WashburnM. F., & ManroH. M.Effect of imperceptible lines on judgment of distance. Amer. J. Psychol., 1908, 19, 242.