EriksonC. W., & BrowneC. T.An experimental and theoretical analysis of perceptual defence. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1956, 52, 224–230.
4.
McGinniesE., & ShermanH.Generalization of perceptual defence. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1952, 47, 81–85.
5.
McNamaraH. J.SolleyC. M., & LongJ.The effects of punishment (electric-shock) on perceptual learning. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1958, 57, 91–98.
6.
ManganG. L.The role of punishment in figure-ground reorganisation. J. exp. Psychol., 1959, 58, 369–375.
7.
PostmanL.BronsonW. C., & GropperG. L.Is there a mechanism of perceptual defence?J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1953, 48, 215–224.
8.
SchaferR., & MurphyG.The role of autism in visual figure-ground relationship. J. exp. Psychol., 1943, 32, 335–343.
9.
SmockC. D.Replication and comments: “An experimental reunion of psychoanalytic theory with perceptual vigilance and defence.”J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1956, 53, 68–73.
10.
SolomonR. L., & HowesD. S.Word frequency, personal values, and visual duration thresholds. Psychol. Rev., 1951, 58, 256–270.
11.
WaltersR. H.BanksR. K., & RyderR. R.A test of the perceptual defence hypothesis. J. Pers., 1959, 27, 47–55.
