ArnoultM. D.Familiarity and recognition of nonsense shapes. J. exp. Psychol., 1956, 51, 269–276.
2.
ArnoultM. D.Prediction of perceptual responses from structural characteristics of the stimulus. Percept. Mot. Skills, 1960, 11, 261–268.
3.
AttneaveF.Physical determinants of the judged complexity of shapes. J. exp. Psychol., 1957, 53, 221–227.
4.
AttneaveF.Applications of information theory to psychology. New York: Holt-Dryden, 1959.
5.
AttneaveF.ArnoultM. D.The quantitative study of shape and pattern perception. Psychol. Bull., 1956, 53, 452–471.
6.
BattigW. F.Paired-associate learning under simultaneous repetition and non-repetition conditions. J. exp. Psychol., 1962, 64, in press.
7.
BattigW. F.BrackettH. R.Comparison of anticipation and recall methods in paired-associate learning. Psychol. Rep., 1961, 9, 59–65.
8.
ElliottL. L.Factor structures of semantic differential responses to visual forms and prediction of factor scores from structural characteristics of the stimuli. Amer. Psychologist, 1961, 16, 420. (Abstract).
9.
GoldsteinA. G.Spatial orientation as a factor in eliciting associative responses to random shapes. Percept. Mot. Skills, 1961, 12, 15–25.
10.
VanderplasJ. M.GarvinE. A.The association value of random shapes. J. exp. Psychol., 1959, 57, 147–154.
