Directional Response-Bias in Reproducing Brief Visual Patterns

Anderson I. H. The effect of letter-position on range of apprehension scores, with special reference to reading disability. Univer. Mich. Sch. Educ. Bull., 1946, 18, 37–40.

Anderson I. Crosland H. R. A method of measuring the effect of primacy of report in the range of attention experiment. Amer. J. Psychol., 1933, 45, 701–713.

Bryden M. P. Tachistoscopic recognition of non-alphabetical material. Canad. J. Psychol., 1960, 14, 78–86.

Harcum E. R. Three inferred factors in the visual recognition of binary targets. In Wulfeck J. W. Taylor J. H. (Eds.), Form discrimination as related to military problems. Washington, D. C.: Nat. Acad. Sci.-Nat. Res. Coun., 1957. (Publ. 561) Pp. 32–37.

Harcum E. R. Visual recognition along various meridians of the visual field: II. Nine-element typewritten targets. Univer. of Mich., Proj. Michigan Rep. 2144–293-T, 1958.

Harcum E. R. Rabe A. Visual recognition along various meridians of the visual field: III. Patterns of blackened circles in an eight-circle template. Univer. of Mich., Proj. Michigan Rep. 2144–294-T, 1958.

Heron W. Perception as a function of retinal locus and attention. Amer. J. Psychol., 1957, 70, 38–48.

Potter M. C. Perception of symbol orientation and early reading success. Teachers Coll. Contr. Educ., 1949, No. 939.

Shepherd E. M. Reading efficiency of 809 average school children: the effect of reversal on their performance. Amer. J. Ophthal., 1956, 41, 1029–1039.

Siegel S. Nonparametric statistics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.

Sperling G. The information available in brief visual presentation. Psychol. Monogr., 1960, 74, No. 11 (Whole No. 498).