ClarkeJ. I.Statistical map-reading. J. Geogr. Assoc., 1959, 44, 96–104.
2.
EkmanG.Subjective power functions and the method of fractionation. Rep. Psychol. Lab., Univer. Stockholm, 1956, No. 34.
3.
EkmanG.Two generalized ratio scaling methods. J. Psychol., 1958, 45, 287–295.
4.
EkmanG.BergstromB., & KuennapasT.A comparison between two psychophysical scaling methods. Rep. Psychol. Lab., Univer. Stockholm, 1956, No. 37.
5.
EkmanG., & JungeK.Psychophysical relations in the perception of visual length, area and volume, with a cartographic application. Rep. Psychol. Lab., Univer. Stockholm, 1960, No. 83.
6.
EkmanG., & JungeK.Psychophysical relations in visual perception of length, area and volume. Scand. J. Psychol., 1961, 2, 1–10.
7.
KuennapasT.Measurements of subjective length in the vertical-horizontal illusion. Acta Psychol., 1958, 14, 371–374.
8.
StevensS. S.On the psychophysical law. Psychol. Rev., 1957, 64, 153–181.
9.
StevensS. S., & GalanterE. H.Ratio scales and category scales for a dozen perceptual continua. J. exp. Psychol., 1957, 54, 377–411.
10.
TavesE. H.Two mechanisms for the perception of visual numerousness. Arch. Psychol., N.Y., 1941, 37, No. 265.
11.
WilliamsR. L.Statistical symbols for maps: their design and relative values. Report on project research under Contract NR 008-006, Nonr 609(03), of the Office of Naval Research, 1956.