AdamsJ. A., & BoulterL. R.Monitoring of complex visual display. 1. Effects of response complexity and intersignal interval on vigilant behavior when visual load is moderate. Air Force Command and Control Development Division, Aviation Psychol. Lab., Univer. of Illinois, Urbana, Ill., 1960. (Tech. Note AFCCDD-TN-60-63)
2.
BroadbentD. E.Effects of noises of high and low frequency on behavior. Ergonomics, 1957, 1, 21–29.
3.
BroadbentD. E.Perception and communication. New York: Pergamon, 1958.
4.
BrogdenW. J., & MillerG. A.Physiological noise generated under earphone cushions. J. Acoust. Soc. Amer., 1947, 19, 620–623.
5.
BucknerD. N.HarabedianA., & McGrathJ. J.A study of individual differences in vigilance performance. Los Angeles, Calif.: Hum. Fac. Res., Inc., 1960. (Tech. Rep. 2)
HawkesG. R., & LoebM.Vigilance for cutaneous and auditory signals. J. aud. Res., 1961, 1, 272–286.
8.
LindquistE. F.Design and analysis of experiments in psychology and education. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1953.
9.
LivingstonR. B.Central control of receptors and sensory transmission systems. In FieldJ. & MagounH. W. (Eds.), Handbook of physiology. Vol. 1. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1959.
10.
LoebM., & SchmidtE. A.A comparison of the effects of different kinds of information in maintaining efficiency on an auditory monitoring task. Ft. Knox, Ky.: USA Med. Res. Lab., 1960. (Rep. No. 453)
11.
LoebM., & SchmidtE. A.Influence of time on task and false information on efficiency of responding to pure tones. Ft. Knox, Ky.: USA Med. Res. Lab., 1960. (Rep. No. 426)
12.
MackworthN. H.Researches on the measurements of human performance. London: H. M. Stationery Office, 1950. (Med. Res. Coun. Spec. Rep. No. 268)
13.
McCormackP. D.Performance in a vigilance task with and without knowledge of results. Canad. J. Psychol., 1959, 13, 68–71.
14.
McCormackP. D.Performance in a vigilance task as a function of length of inter-stimulus interval. Canad. J. Psychol., 1960, 14, 265–268.
15.
McGrathJ. J.The effect of irrelevant environmental stimulation on vigilance. Los Angeles: Hum. Fac. Res., 1960. (Tech. Rep. 6)
16.
SharplessS. K., & JasperH.Habituation of the arousal reaction. Brain, 1956, 79, 655–680.
17.
SolandtD. Y., & PartridgeD. M.Research on auditory problems presented by naval operations. J. Canad. med. Serv., 1946, 3, 323–329.
18.
StevensS. S.Cross-modality matching of subjective scales for loudness, vibration, and electric shock. J. exp. Psychol., 1959, 57, 201–209.
19.
StevensS. S.To honor Fechner and repeal his law. Science, 1961, 133, 80–86.