Assumptions,Adaptation-Level,and Projective Techniques

Abt L. A theory of projective psychology. In Abt L. E. & Bellak L. (Eds.), Projective psychology. New York: Knopf, 1950. Pp. 33–66.

Allport G. W. The trend in motivational theory. Amer. J. Orothopsychiat., 1953, 23, 107–119.

Atkinson J. W. Studies in projective measurement of achievement motivation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univer. of Michigan, 1950.

Auld F. Eron L. D. , & Laffal J. Application of Guttman's scaling method to the TAT. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1955, 15, 422–435.

Bijou S. W. , & Kenny D. T. The ambiguity of TAT cards. J. consult. Psychol., 1951, 15, 203–209.

Brozek K. Guetzkow H. , & Baldwin M. V. A quantitative study of perception and association in experimental semi-starvation. J. Pers., 1951, 19, 245–264.

Bruner J. S. Perceptual theory and the Rorschach test. J. Pers., 1948, 17, 157–168.

Carr A. C. The relation of certain Rorschach variables to expression of affect in the TAT and SCT. J. proj. Tech., 1956, 20, 137–142.

Clark R. A. The projective measurement of experimentally induced levels of sexual motivation. J. exp. Psychol., 1952, 44, 391–399.

Cook R. A. Identification and ego defensiveness in thematic apperception. J. proj. Tech., 1953, 17, 312–319.

Davids A. Comparison of three methods of personality assessment: direct, indirect, and projective. J. Pers., 1955, 23, 423–440.

Edwards A. L. Edwards Personal Preference Schedule, Manual. New York: Psychological Corp., 1954.

Eriksen C. W. Needs in perception and projective techniques. J. proj. Tech., 1954, 18, 435–440.

Eron L. D. A normative study of the Thematic Apperception Test. Psychol. Monogr., 1950, 64, No. 9 (Whole No. 315).

Eron L. D. Responses of women to the Thematic Apperception Test. J. consult. Psychol., 1953, 17, 269–282.

Frank L. K. Projective methods. Springfield, Ill.: Thomas, 1948.

Funk & Wagnall's new standard dictionary of the English language. New York: Funk & Wagnalls, 1955.

Gibson J. J. The non-projective aspects of the Rorschach experiment: IV. The Rorschach blots considered as pictures. J. soc. Psychol., 1956, 44, 203–206.

Gordon H. L. A comparative study of dreams and responses to the TAT. I. A need-press analysis. J. Pers., 1953, 22, 234–253.

Harrison R. Studies in the use and validity of the TAT with mentally disordered patients. II. A quantitative validity study. III. Validity by the method of “blind analysis.” Charac. & Pers., 1940, 9, 122–138.

Helson H. Adaptation-level as a basis for a quantitative theory of frames of reference. Psychol. Rev., 1948, 55, 297–313.

Helson H. An experimental approach to personality. Psychiat. res. Rep., 1955, 2, 89–99.

Helson H. Blake R. R. Mouton J. S. , & Olmstead J. A. Attitudes as adjustments to stimulus, background and residual factors. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1956, 52, 314–322.

Henry W. E. The TAT in the study of culture-personality relations. Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 1947, 35, 3–135.

Kenny D. T. , & Bijou S. W. Ambiguity of pictures and extent of personality factors in fantasy responses. J. consult. Psychol., 1953, 17, 238–288

Knapp R. H. Experiments in serial reproduction and related aspects of the psychology of rumor. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Harvard Univer., 1948.

Lazarus R. S. Ambiguity and non-ambiguity in projective testing. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1953, 48, 443–445.

Lesser G. S. Application of Guttman's scaling method to aggressive fantasy in children. Educ. psychol. Measmt, 1958, 18, 543–550.

Levine R. Chein I. , & Murphy G. The relation of the intensity of a need to amount of perceptual distortion: a preliminary report. J. Psychol., 1942, 13, 283–293.

Lindzey G. , & Tejessy C. Thematic Apperception Test: indices of aggression in relation to measure of overt and covert behavior. Amer. J. Orthopsychiat., 1956, 26, 567–576.

Macfarlane J. W. , & Tuddeham R. D. Problems in the validation of projective techniques. In Anderson H. H. & Anderson G. L. (Eds.), An introduction to projective techniques. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1951. Pp. 26–54.

Murray H. A. Thematic Apperception Test Manual. Cambridge: Harvard Univer. Press, 1943.

Murray H. A. Uses of the TAT. Amer. J. Psychiat., 1951, 107, 577–581.

Murstein B. I. The projection of hostility on the Rorschach and as a result of ego threat. J. proj. Tech., 1956, 20, 418–428.

Murstein B. I. Nonprojective determinants of perception on the TAT. J. consult. Psychol., 1958, 22, 195–199. (a)

Murstein B. I. The relationship of stimulus ambiguity on the TAT to the productivity of themes. J. consult. Psychol., 1958, 22, 348. (b)

Murstein B. I. Review of Klopfer, Bruno and others, Developments in the Rorschach Technique. Vol. II. Fields of Application. J. proj. Tech., 1958, 22, 248–250. (c)

Murstein B. I. Some determinants of the perception of hostility. J. consult. Psychol., 1958, 22, 65–69. (d)

Murstein B. I. A conceptual model of projective techniques applied to stimulus variations with thematic techniques. J. consult. Psychol., 1959, 23, 3–14.

Murstein B. I. Coulter W. Bowdish C. David C. Fisher D. Furth H. , & Hansen I. A study of scaling methods applied to the TAT for the dimension of hostility, Univer. of Portland, 1959 (mimeographed).

Murstein B. I. , & Wheeler J. I. Jr. The projection of hostility on the Rorschach and Thematic Stories Test. J. clin. Psychol., 1959, 15, 316–319.

Murstein B. I. The effect of long-term illness of children on the emotional adjustment of parents. Child Develop., 1960, 31, 157–171.

Piotrowski Z. A. Perceptanalysis. New York: Macmillan, 1957.

Pittluck P. The relation between aggressive fantasy and overt behavior. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yale Univer., 1950.

Rader G. E. The prediction of overt aggressive verbal behavior from Rorschach content. J. proj. Tech., 1957, 21, 294–306.

Rosenzweig S. Idiodynamics in personality theory with special reference to projective methods. Psychol. Rev., 1951, 58, 213–223.

Rotter J. Social learning and clinical psychology. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1954.

Sarason S. B. The clinical interaction. New York: Harper, 1954.

Schafer R. Psychoanalytic interpretation in Rorschach testing. New York: Grune & Stratton, 1954.

Scodel A. , & Lipetz M. E. TAT hostility and psychopathology. J. proj. Tech., 1957, 21, 161–165.

Shatin L. Rorschach adjustment and the TAT. J. proj. Tech., 1953, 17, 92–101.

Shatin L. Relationships between the Rorschach and the TAT. J. proj. Tech., 1955, 19, 317–331.

Shneidman E. S. Some relationships between the Rorschach technique and other psychodiagnostic tests. In Klopfer B. (Ed.), Developments in the Rorschach technique. Vol. II. Fields of application. New York: World Book, 1956. Pp. 595–642.

Singer W. B. , & Young P. T. Studies in affective reaction. I. A new affective rating-scale. J. gen. Psychol., 1941, 24, 281–301.

Smith J. R. , & Coleman J. C. The relationship between manifestations of hostility in projective tests and overt behavior. J. proj. Tech., 1956, 20, 326–334.

Stern E. , & Horinson S. Concordances et divergences du test de Rorschach et du Thematic Apperception de Murray. Proc. Int. Orthoped. Cong., II. Amsterdam, 1949. Pp. 448–455.

Symonds P. M. Adolescent fantasy: an investigation of the picture-story method of personality study. New York: Columbia Univer. Press., 1949.

Ullmann L. P. Productivity and the clinical use of TAT cards. J. proj. Tech., 1957, 21, 399–403.

Webb W. B. , & Hilden A. H. Verbal and intellectual ability as factors in projective test results. J. proj. Tech., 1953, 17, 102–103.

Weisskopf E. A. An experimental study of the effect of brightness and ambiguity on projection in the TAT. J. Psychol., 1950, 29, 407–416. (a)

Weisskopf E. A. A transcendence index as a proposed measure in the TAT. J. Psychol., 1950, 29, 379–390. (b)

Wirt R. D. Ideational expression of hostile impulses. J. consult. Psychol., 1956, 20, 185–189.