DuboisP. H.BunchM. E.A new technique for studying group-learning. Amer. J. Psychol., 1949, 62, 272–278.
2.
MandlerG.Associative frequency and associative prepotency as measures of response to nonsense syllables. Amer. J. Psychol., 1955, 68, 662–665.
3.
MandlerG.CampbellE. H.Effect of variation in associative frequency of stimulus and response members on paired-associate learning. J. exp. Psychol., 1957, 54, 269–273.
4.
MandlerG.HuttenlocherJ.The relationship between associative frequency, associative ability and paired-associate learning. Amer. J. Psychol., 1956, 69, 424–428.
5.
McGeochJ. A.The influence of associative value upon the difficulty of nonsense-syllable lists. J. genet. Psychol., 1930, 37, 421–426.
6.
NobleC. E.An analysis of meaning. Psychol. Rev., 1952, 59, 421–430.
7.
NobleC. E.StockwellF. E.PryerM. W.Meaningfulness (m′) and association value (a) in paired-associate syllable learning. Psychol. Rep., 1957, 3, 441–452.
8.
SheffieldF. D.The role of meaningfulness of stimulus and response in verbal learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Yale Univer., 1946.
9.
SchmidtW. H.BunchM. E.Group methods of studying paired-associates and maze-learning. Amer. J. Psychol., 1951, 64, 106–108.
10.
UmemotoT.MorikawaY.IbukiM.The non-association values and meaningfulness of 1892 Japanese two-letter syllables and words. Jap. J. Psychol., 1955, 26, 148–155.