Abstract
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Arnoult
M. D.
Familiarity and recognition of nonsense shapes . J. exp. Psychol. , 1956 , 269 –276 .
2.
Attneave
F.
A method of graded dichotomies for the scaling of judgments . Psychol. Rev. , 1949 , 56 , 334 –340 .
3.
Attneave
F.
Physical determinants of the judged complexity of shapes . J. exp. Psychol. , 1957 , 53 , 221 –227 .
4.
Attneave
F.
Arnoult
M. D.
The quantitative study of shape and pattern perception . Psychol. Bull. , 1956 , 53 , 452 –471 .
5.
Dubois
P. H.
Multivariate correlational analysis . New York : Harper , 1957 .
6.
Elliott
L. L.
Reliability of judgments of figural complexity . J. exp. Psychol. , 1958 , 56 , 335 –338 .
7.
Gibson
J. J.
Gibson
E. J.
Perceptual learning: Differentiation or enrichment? Psychol. Rev. , 1955 , 62 , 32 –41 . (a)
8.
Gibson
J. J.
Gibson
E. J.
What is learned in perceptual learning? A reply to Professor Postman . Psychol. Rev. , 1955 , 62 , 447 –450 . (b)
9.
Hochberg
J.
McAlister
E.
A quantitative approach to figural “goodness.” J. exp. Psychol. , 1953 , 46 , 361 –364 .
10.
Noble
C. E.
The meaning-familiarity relationships . Psychol. Rev. , 1953 , 60 , 89 –98 .
11.
Noble
C. E.
The familiarity-frequency relationship . J. exp. Psychol. , 1954 , 47 , 13 –16 .
12.
Postman
L.
Association theory and perceptual learning . Psychol. Rev. , 1955 , 62 , 438 –446 .