BrunerJ. S.Personality dynamics and the process of perceiving. In BlakeR. R.RamseyG. V. (Eds.), Perception: An approach to personality. New York: Ronald, 1951.
EriksenC. W.BrowneC. T.An experimental and theoretical analysis of perceptual defense. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1956, 52, 224–230.
6.
FreemanJ. T.Set or perceptual defense?J. exp. Psychol., 1954, 48, 283–288.
7.
FreemanJ. T.Set versus perceptual defense: A confirmation. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1955, 51, 710–712.
8.
LacyO. W.LewingerN.AdamsonJ. F.Foreknowledge as a factor affecting perceptual defense and alertness. J. exp. Psychol., 1953, 45, 169–174.
9.
PerloeS. I.An experimental test of two theories of perceptual defense. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univer. of Michigan, 1958. Available on microfilm from University Microfilms, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
10.
PerloeS. I.Inhibition as a general cognitive process. Symposium: A decade of “new look” perception. Paper read at Amer. Psychol. Assn, Cincinnati, Ohio, 1959. Amer. Psychologist, 1959, 14, 379.
11.
PostmanL.On the problem of perceptual defense. Psychol. Rev., 1953, 60, 298–306.
12.
SiegelS.Non-parametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1956.
13.
SolomonR. L.HowesD. H.Word frequency, personal values and visual duration thresholds. Psychol. Rev., 1951, 58, 256–270.
14.
WhittakerE. M.GilchristJ. C.FischerJ. W.Perceptual defense or response suppression. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1952, 47, 732–733.