CharlesJ. P.DuncanC. P.The distance gradient in kinesthetic figural aftereffect. J. exp. Psychol., 1959, 57, 164–170.
2.
EysenckH. J.Cortical inhibition, figural aftereffect, and theory of personality. J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1955, 51, 94–106.
3.
HammerE. R.Temporal factors in figural after-effects. Amer. J. Psychol., 1949, 62, 337–354.
4.
HayesS. P.Jr.Tables of the standard error of tetrachoric correlation coefficient. Psychometrika, 1943, 8, 193–203.
5.
KleinG. S.KrechD.Cortical conductivity in the brain injured. J. Pers., 1952, 21, 118–148.
6.
KoehlerW.WallachH.Figural after-effects: An investigation of visual processes. Proc. Amer. phil. Soc., 1944, 88, 269–357.
7.
LipmanR. S.SpitzH. H.An experimental test of the similarity between Hull's inhibition constructs and Koehler's satiation construct. Paper read at East. Psychol. Assn, Atlantic City, April, 1959.
8.
McEwenP.Figural after-effects. Brit. J. Psychol., Monogr. Suppl., 1958, No. 31.
9.
McNemarQ.Psychological statistics. New York: Wiley, 1949.
10.
SagaraM.OyamaT.Experimental studies on figural aftereffects in Japan. Psychol. Bull., 1957, 54, 327–338.
11.
SpitzH. H.The present status of the Koehler-Wallach theory of satiation. Psychol. Bull., 1958, 55, 1–28.
12.
SpitzH. H.Formulas for measuring recovery from figural aftereffects. Percept. Mot. Skills, 1959, 9, 253–254.
13.
SpivackG.LevineM.Spiral aftereffect and measures of satiation in brain-injured and normal subjects. J. Pers., 1959, 27, 211–227.
14.
ThorndikeR. L.Personnel selection. New York: Wiley, 1949.
15.
WertheimerM.Figural aftereffects as a measure of metabolic efficiency. J. Pers., 1955, 24, 56–73.
16.
WertheimerM.LeventhalC. M.“Permanent” satiation phenomena with kinesthetic figural aftereffects. J. exp. Psychol., 1958, 55, 255–257.