Response Strength as a Function of Magnitude of Perceived Incentive

Bayer E. Beitrage zur Zweikomponententheorie des Hungers. Z. f. Psychol., 1929, 112, 1–54.

Czeh R. S. Response strength as a function of the magnitude of incentive and consummatory time in the goal box. Unpublished master's thesis, State Univer. of Iowa, 1954.

Fay J. C. Miller J. D. Harlow H. F. Incentive size, food deprivation, and food preference. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1953, 46, 13–15.

Grindley G. C. Experiments on the influence of the amount of reward on learning in young chickens. Brit. J. Psychol., 1929–30, 20, 173–180.

Mason D. J. The relation of quantity, quality and probability of reward to reaction potential and secondary reinforcement. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Univer. of Illinois, 1956.

Spence K. W. Behavior theory and conditioning. New Haven: Yale Univer. Press, 1956.

Spence K. W. Bergman G. Lippitt R. A study of simple learning under irrelevant motivational-reward conditions. J. exp. Psychol., 1950, 40, 539–551.

Swisher D. E. The role of magnitude of reward in determining instrumental performance level. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, State Univer. of Iowa, 1951.

Wike E. L. Casey A. The secondary reward value of food for satiated animals. J. comp. physiol. Psychol., 1954, 47, 441–443.

Wolfe J. B. Kaplon M. D. Effect of amount of reward and consummatory activity on learning in chickens. J. comp. Psychol., 1941, 31, 353–361.

Yoshioka J. G. Size preference of albino rats. J. genet. Psychol., 1930, 37, 427–430.