Human Figure Drawings as Indicators of Sexual Identification and Inversion

Barker A. J. Mathis J. K. Powers C. A. Drawing characteristics of male homosexuals. J. clin. Psychol., 1953, 9, 185–188.

Brown D. G. Sex-role preference in young children. Psychol. Monogr., 1956, 70, No. 14 (Whole No. 421).

Brown D. G. Masculinity-femininity development in children. J. consult. Psychol., 1957, 21, 197–202.

Brown F. House-Tree-Person and human figure drawings. In Brower D. Abt L. E. (Eds.), Progress in clinical psychology. Vol. I. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1952. Pp. 173–184.

Buck J. N. The H-T-P technique: A qualitative and quantitative scoring manual. J. clin. Psychol., 1948, 4, 317–396

Caligor L. The determination of the individual's unconscious conception of his own masculine-feminine identification J. proj. Tech., 1951, 15, 494–509.

Darke R. A. Geil G. A. Homosexual activity. Relation of degree and role to the Goodenough Test and to the Cornell Selectee Index. J. nerv. ment. Dis., 1948, 108, 217–240.

Diamond S. The House and Tree in verbal fantasy: I. Age and sex differences in themes and content. J. proj. Tech., 1954, 18, 316–325.

Diamond S. The House and Tree in verbal fantasy: II. Their different roles. J. proj. Tech., 1954, 18, 415–417.

Feather D. B. An exploratory study in the use of figure drawings in a group situation. J. soc. Psychol., 1953, 37, 163–170.

Frank G. H. A test of the use of a figure drawing test as an indicator of sexual inversion. Psychol. Rep., 1955, 1, 137–138.

Geil G. A. The use of the Goodenough Test for revealing male homosexuality. J. clin. psychopath. Psychother., 1944, 6, 307–321.

Granick S. Smith L. J. Sex sequence in the Draw-a-Person Test and its relation to the MMPI Masculinity-Femininity Scale. J. consult. Psychol., 1953, 17, 71–73.

Hammer E. F. Relationship between diagnosis of psychosexual pathology and the sex of the first drawn person. J. clin. Psychol., 1954, 10, 168–170.

Holtzman W. H. The examiner as a variable in the Draw-a-Person Test. J. consult. Psychol., 1952, 16, 145–148.

Jolles I. A study of the validity of some hypotheses for the qualitative interpretation of the H-T-P for children of elementary school age: I. Sexual identification. J. clin. Psychol., 1952, 8, 113–118.

Kinsey A. C. Pomeroy W. B. Martin C. E. Gebhard P. H. Sexual behavior in the human female. Phila.: Saunders, 1953.

Knopf I. J. Richards T. W. The child's differentiation of sex as reflected in drawings of the human figure. J. genet. Psychol., 1952, 81, 99–112.

Levy S. Figure drawing as a projective test. In Abt L. E. Bellak L. (Eds.), Projective psychology: Clinical approaches to the total personality. New York: Knopf, 1950. Pp. 257–297.

Machover K. Personality projection in the drawing of the human figure. Springfield, Ill.: Thomas, 1949.

Machover K. Human figure drawings of children. J. proj. Tech., 1953, 17, 85–91.

Mainord F. R. A note on the use of figure drawings in the diagnosis of sexual inversion. J. clin. Psychol., 1953, 9, 188–189.

Morris W. W. Ontogenetic changes in adolescence reflected by the Drawing-Human-Figures Techniques. Amer. J. Orthopsychiat., 1955, 25, 720–728.

Tolor A. Tolor B. Judgment of children's popularity from their human figure drawings. J. proj. Tech., 1955, 19, 170–176.

Weider A. Noller P. A. Objective studies of children's drawings of human figures. I. Sex awareness and socio-economic level. J. clin. Psychol., 1950, 6, 319–325.

Weider A. Noller P. A. Objective studies of children's drawings of human figures. II. Sex, age, intelligence. J. clin. Psychol., 1953, 9, 20–23.

Zimmer M. Validity of sentence completion tests and human figure drawings. In Brower D. Abt L. E. (Eds.), Progress in clinical psychology. Vol. 2. New York: Grune and Stratton, 1956. Pp. 58–75.

Zuckerman M. Tresselt M. E. The objective characteristics of the figure drawing test in a hospital population. Psychol. Newsltr., 1953, No. 46, 1–12.