ArcherJ. E.Post rest performance in motor learning as a function of prerest degree of distribution of practice. J. exp. Psychol., 1954, 47, 47–51.
2.
HullC. L.Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1943.
3.
KientzleM. J.Properties of learning curves under varied distributions of practice. J. exp. Psychol., 1946, 36, 187–211.
4.
KientzleM. J.Ability patterns under disttibuted practice. J. exp. Psychol., 1949, 39, 532–537.
5.
KimbleG. A.An experimental test of a two-factor theory of inhibition. J. exp. Psychol., 1949, 39, 15–23.
6.
LindquistE. F.Design and analysis of experiments in psychology and education. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1953.
7.
SchuckerR. E.StevensL. B.EllisD. S.A retest for conditioned inhibition in the alphabet printing task. J. exp. Psychol., 1953, 46, 97–102.
8.
SilverR. J.Effect of amount and distribution of warming-up activity on retention in motor learning. J. exp. Psychol., 1952, 44, 88–95.
9.
WassermanH. N.The effect of motivation and amount of pre-rest practice upon inhibitory potential in motor learning. J. exp. Psychol., 1951, 42, 162–172.
10.
ZeamanD.KaufmanH.Individual differences and theory in a motor learning task. Psychol. Monogr., 1955, 69, 1–15.
