This commentary focuses on the need for proper inclusion criteria for research on children who have motor problems. Researchers must be aware of the large range of individual differences found in samples used in research on children with Developmental Coordination Disorder. New theoretical perspectives in development and learning are a basis for research and practice.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Psychiatric Association. (2000) Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. (4th ed.) Washington, DC: Author.
2.
ConnollyK. (1986) A perspective on motor development. In WadeM. G.WhitingH. T. A. (Eds.), Motor development in children: Aspects of coordination and control. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
3.
EdelmanG. M. (1987) Neural Darwinism. New York: Basic Books.
4.
EdelmanG. M. (1992) Bright air, brilliant fire: On the matter of the mind. New York: Basic Books.
5.
GeuzeR. H.JongmansM. J.SchoemakerM. M.Smits-EngelsmanB. C. (2001) Clinical and research diagnostic criteria for developmental coordination disorder: A review and discussion. Human Movement Science, 20,7–17.
6.
GottliebG. (1998) Normal occurring environmental and behaviour influences on gene activity: From central dogma to probabilistic epigenesis. Psychological Review, 105,792–802.
7.
HagaM.PedersenA. V.SigmundssonH. (2007) Interrelationship among selected measures of motor skills. Child: Care, Health and Development, 34,245–248.
8.
RevieG.LarkinD. (1993) Task-specific intervention with children reduces movement problems. Adapted Physical Activity Quarterly, 10,29–41.
9.
SigmundssonH. (2005) Disorders of motor development (clumsy child syndrome). Journal of Neural Transmission, 69,51–68.
10.
TsaiC. L.WuS. K. (2008) Relationship of visual perceptual deficit and motor impairment in children with Developmental Coordination Disorder. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 107,457–472.
