The goal of this study was to establish whether the deterioration of the useful visual field due to sleep deprivation and age in a screen monitoring activity could be explained by a decrease in perceptual sensitivity and/or a modification of the participant's decision criterion (two indices derived from signal detection theory). In the first experiment, a comparison of three age groups (young, middle-aged, elderly) showed that perceptual sensitivity decreased with age and that the decision criterion became more conservative. In the second experiment, measurement of the useful visual field was carried out on participants who had been deprived of sleep the previous night or had a complete night of sleep. Perceptual sensitivity significantly decreased with sleep debt, and sleep deprivation provoked an increase in the participants' decision criterion. Moreover, the comparison of two age groups (young, middle-aged) indicated that sensitivity decreased with age. The value of using these two indices to explain the deterioration of useful visual field is discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BallK.BeardB.RoenkerD.MillerR.GriggsD. (1988) Age and visual search: Expanding the useful field of view. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 5(12), 2210–2219.
2.
BallK.OwsleyC. (1993) The useful field of view test: A new technique for evaluating age related declines in visual function. Journal of the American Optometric Association, 64 (1), 71–79.
3.
BallK.OwsleyC.SloaneM. E.RoenkerD. L.BruniJ. R. (1993) Visual attention problems as a predictor of vehicle crashes in older drivers. Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science, 34(11), 3110–3123.
4.
BallK.RoenkerD.BruniJ. (1990) Developmental changes in attention and visual search throughout adulthood. In EnnsJ. T. (Ed.), The development of attention: Research and theory.Amsterdam: Elsevier. Pp. 489–508.
5.
BerardiA.ParasuramanR.HaxbyJ. (2001) Overall vigilance and sustained attention decrements in healthy aging, experimental Aging Research, 27(1), 19–39.
6.
BotwinickJ. (1984) Aging and behaviour.New York: Springer.
7.
ColquhounW. P.EdwardsR. S. (1970) Practice effects on a visual vigilance task with and without search. Human Factors, 12(6), 537–545.
8.
CraigA. (1979) Nonparametric measures of sensory efficiency for sustained monitoring tasks. Human Factors, 21, 69–78.
9.
DaviesD. R.ParasuramanR. (1982) The psychology of vigilance.New York: Academic Press.
10.
EganJ. P.GreenbergG. Z.SchulmanA. I. (1961) Operating characteristics, signal detectability, and the method of free response. Journal of Acoustical Society, 33, 993–1013.
11.
GreenD. M.SwetsJ. A. (1966) Signal detection theory and psychophysics.New York: Wiley.
12.
GrierJ. B. (1971) Nonparametric indexes for sensitivity and bias: Computing formulae. Psychological Bulletin, 75, 424–429.
13.
HorneJ.AndersonN.WilkinsonR. (1983) Effects of sleep deprivation on signal detection measures of vigilance: Implications for sleep function. Sleep, 6(4), 347–358.
14.
JerisonH. J. (1977) Vigilance: Biology, psychology, theory, and practise. In MackieR. R. (Ed.), Vigilance, theory, operational performance, and physiological correlates.New York: Plenum. Pp. 27–40.
15.
JerisonH. J.PickettR. M.StensonH. H. (1965) The elicited observing rate and decision processes in vigilance. Human Factors, 7, 107–128.
16.
LongG. M.WaagW. L. (1981) Limitations on the practical applicability of d' and B' measures. Human Factors, 23(3), 285–290.
MuzetV. (1998) Conception, réalisation et validation d'un système de mesure du champ visuel utile chez l'homme. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Université Louis Pasteur, Strasbourg, France, [in French].
19.
MuzetV.RogéJ.JounyC.MuzetA. (1999) Changes in central and peripheral vision before and after a simulated driving task. In GaleA. G.BrownI. D.HaslegraveC. M.TaylorS. P. (Eds.), Vision in vehicles VII. Amsterdam: Elsevier. Pp. 139–147.
20.
OkunM. A. (1976) Adult age and cautioness in decision: A review. Human Development, 19, 220–233.
21.
OwsleyC. (1994) Vision and driving in the elderly. Optometry and Vision Science, 71(12), 727–735.
22.
OwsleyC.BallK.McGwinG.SloaneM. E.RoenkerD. L.WhiteM. F.OverleyE. T. (1998) Visual processing impairment and risk of motor vehicle crash among older adults. Journal of the American Medical Association, 279(14), 1083–1088.
23.
OwsleyC.McGwinG.BallK. (1998) Vision impairment, eye disease, and injurious motor vehicle crashes in the elderly. Ophthalmic Epidemiology, 5(2), 101–113.
24.
ParasuramanA. (1986) Vigilance, monitoring and search. In BoffK.KaufmanL.ThomasJ. (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance.New York: Wiley. Pp. 43.1–43.39.
25.
ParasuramanR.DaviesD. R. (1975) Response and evoked potential latencies associated with commission errors in visual monitoring. Perception and Pyschophysics, 17(5), 465–468.
26.
ParasuramanR.DaviesD. R. (1976) Decision theory analysis of response latencies in vigilance. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 2(4), 578–590.
27.
ParasuramanR.DaviesD. R. (1977) A taxonomic analysis of vigilance performance. In MackieR. R. (Ed.), Vigilance, theory, operational performance, and physiological correlates.New York: Plenum. Pp. 559–574.
28.
ParasuramanR.MoulouaM. (1987) Interaction of signal discriminability and task type in vigilance decrement. Perception and Psychophysics, 41(1), 17–22.
29.
ParasuramanR.NestorP.GreenwoodP. (1989) Sustained-attention capacity in young and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 4(3), 339–345.
30.
RogéJ.KielbasaL.MuzetA. (2002) Deformation of the useful visual field with state of vigilance, task priority, and central task complexity. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 95, 118–130.
31.
RogéJ.OtmaniS.PébayleT.MuzetA. (2008) The impact of age on useful visual field deterioration and risk evaluation in a simulated driving task. European Review of Applied Psychology, 58, 5–12.
32.
RogéJ.PébayleT.HannachiS. E.MuzetA. (2003) Effect of sleep deprivation and driving duration on the useful visual field in younger and older subjects during simulator driving. Vision Research, 43(13), 1465–1472.
33.
RogéJ.PébayleT.KiehnL.MuzetA. (2002) Alteration of the useful visual field as a function of state of vigilance in simulated car driving. Transportation Research, Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 5, 189–200.
34.
RogéJ.PébayleT.LambilliotteE.SpitzenstetterF.GiselbrechtD.MuzetA. (2004) Influence of age, speed and duration of monotonous driving task in traffic on the driver's useful visual field. Vision Research, 44(23), 2737–2744.
35.
RosenbloomT.WolfY. (2002) Signal detection in conditions of everyday life traffic dilemmas. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 34(6), 763–772.
36.
ScialfaC.KlineD.LymanB. (1987) Age differences in target identification as a function of retinal location and noise level: Examination of the useful field of view. Psychology and Aging, 2, 14–19.
37.
SeipleW.SzlykJ. P.YangS.HolopigianK. (1996) Age-related functional field losses are not eccentricity dependent. Vision Research, 36(12), 1859–1866.
38.
SekulerA. B.BennettP. J.MamelakM. (2000) Effects of aging on the useful field of view. Experimental Aging Research, 26, 103–120.
39.
SekulerR.BallK. (1986) Visual localization: Age and practice. Journal of the Optical Society of America, 3, 864–867.
40.
SimsR. V.McGwinG. J.AllmanR. M.BallK.OwsleyC. (2000) Exploratory study of incident vehicle crashes among older drivers. Journal of Gerontology: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 55(1), M22–M27.
41.
SwetsJ. A. (1977) Signal detection theory applied to vigilance. In MackieR. R. (Ed.), Vigilance, theory, operational performance and physiological correlates.New York: Plenum.
42.
TassiP.DufourA.DewasmesG.MuzetA. (2000) Effects of ambient temperature on visual sensitivity and decision-making in a paradigm of inverted sleep-wake cycle. European Review for Applied Psychology, 49(4), 195–202.
43.
WilliamsL. (1982) Cognitive load and the functional field of view. The Human Factors Society, 12, 684–692.
44.
WilliamsP. S. (1986) Processing demands, training, and the vigilance decrement. Human Factors, 28(5), 567–569.
45.
ZarJ. H. (1984) Biostatistical analysis.Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
