Variable Practice versus Constant Practice in the Acquisition of Wheelchair Propulsive Speeds

Abstract

Previous studies have demonstrated that varied practice (involving several versions of a skill) has advantage over constant practice (involving only one version of a skill) in learning a motor skill. However, the support for variable practice mainly came from studies using discrete motor skills. Therefore, the purpose of the study was to assess if variable practice was more effective than constant practice for the purpose of learning a continuous and real-life motor skill: wheelchair propulsion. A total of 36 able-bodied undergraduate students participated in this study. There were two constant-practice groups. One group practiced wheelchair propulsion on a roller system with a single speed, 30% of the maximum speed (30%-only group), and one group practiced using 55% of the maximum speed (55%-only group). One variable-practice group (variable group) practiced the propulsion with two different speeds, 30 and 55% of the maximum speed. In addition to retention tests, two transfer tests (i.e., tests on 40 and 70% of the maximum speeds) were performed by the three groups after the 10 weeks of training. The results were mixed. The variable-practice group produced significantly fewer absolute errors on both transfer tests than the 30%-only group. However, when compared to the 55%-only group, the variable-practice group only produced significantly fewer absolute errors on the transfer test at 70% speed, but not at 40% speed.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Heckman

C. J.

Binder

M. D.

(1990) Neural mechanisms underlying the orderly recruitment of motoneurons. In Binder

M. D.

Mendell

L. M.

(Eds.), The segmental motor system. New York: Oxford Univer. Press. Pp. 182–204.

Heitman

R. J.

Pugh

S. F.

Kovaleski

J. E.

Norell

P. M.

Vicory

J. R.

(2005) Effects of specific versus variable practice on the retention and transfer of a continuous motor skill. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 100, 1107–1113.

McCracken

H. D.

Stelmach

G. E.

(1977) A test of the schema theory of discrete motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 9, 193–201.

Schmidt

R. A.

(1975) A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82, 225–260.

Schmidt

R. A.

(2003) Motor schema theory after 27 years: Reflections and implications for a new theory. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74, 366–375.

Schmidt

R. A.

Lee

T. D.

(2005) Motor control and learning — a behavioral emphasis. (4th ed.) Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Pp. 193–204.

Shea

C. H.

Kohl

R. M.

(1990) Specificity and variability of practice. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 61, 169–177.

Shea

C. H.

Kohl

R. M.

(1991) Comparison of practice: Influence on the retention of motor skills. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 62, 187–195.

Shoenfelt

E. L.

Snyder

L. A.

Maue

A. E.

McDowell

C. P.

Woolard

C. D.

(2002) Comparison of constant and variable practice conditions on free-throw shooting. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 94, 1113–1123.

10.

Yao

W. X.

(2003) Average KR schedule benefits generalized motor program learning. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 97, 185–191.

11.

Yao

W. X.

Enoka

Fuglevand

A. J.

(2000) Motor-unit synchronization increases EMG amplitude and decreases force steadiness of simulated contractions. Journal of Neurophysiology, 70, 2479–2489.