This letter addresses some issues in Lohman's (2008) article on students' perceptions of face-to-face pseudostuttering experiences. Concerns include the valuation of the pseudostuttering experiences on the telephone as compared to face-to-face experiences in training graduate students in speech-language pathology.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AllportG. W. (1954) The nature of prejudice.Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2.
HamR. E. (1990) Clinician preparation: Experiences with pseudostuttering, “It was the longest day of my life!”Journal of Fluency Disorders, 15, 305–315.
3.
HansonB. R.GronhovdK. D.RiceP. L. (1981) A shortened version of Southern Illinois University speech situation checklist for the identification of speech-related anxiety. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 6, 351–360.
4.
LeithW. R.TimmonsT. L. (1983) The stutterer's reaction to the telephone as a speaking situation. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 8, 233–243.
5.
LohmanP. (2008) Students' perceptions of face-to-face pseudostuttering experience. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 107, 951–962.
6.
RamiM. K.KalinowskiJ.StuartA.RastatterM. P. (2003) Self-perceptions of speech language pathologists-in-training before and after pseudostuttering experiences on the telephone. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25, 491–496.
7.
StangorC. (2000) Stereotypes and prejudice.Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
